2019
DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdz446.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Randomised efficacy and safety results for atezolizumab (Atezo) + bevacizumab (Bev) in patients (pts) with previously untreated, unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Arm A of NCT02715531 was a single-arm phase Ib study of the combination of atezolizumab (a PD-L1 antibody) and bevacizumab (a VEGF antibody) in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. Updated results from the 104 unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma patients in Arm A were presented at the annual meeting of the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) in Barcelona, in the fall of 2019 [33]. Fifty-three percent of patients had macroscopic vascular invasion (MVI), of whom 88% were hepatocellular carcinoma patients with highly advanced extrahepatic spread (EHS).…”
Section: Classification Of the Tumor Microenvironment And Determination Of Immunotherapeutic Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Arm A of NCT02715531 was a single-arm phase Ib study of the combination of atezolizumab (a PD-L1 antibody) and bevacizumab (a VEGF antibody) in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. Updated results from the 104 unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma patients in Arm A were presented at the annual meeting of the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) in Barcelona, in the fall of 2019 [33]. Fifty-three percent of patients had macroscopic vascular invasion (MVI), of whom 88% were hepatocellular carcinoma patients with highly advanced extrahepatic spread (EHS).…”
Section: Classification Of the Tumor Microenvironment And Determination Of Immunotherapeutic Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since then, until the emergence of atezolizumab in combination with bevacizumab, no treatment has surpassed the first-line efficacy of sorafenib[ 18 , 85 ]. In a phase 1b randomized cohort trial comprising 119 patients, atezolizumab in combination with bevacizumab resulted in significantly higher mPFS (7 mo) and ORR (36%) than atezolizumab monotherapy[ 86 ]. In the IMbrave150 clinical trial (NCT03434379) (Table 4 ), compared with sorafenib, the combination of atezolizumab (PD-L1) and bevacizumab (a vascular epidermal growth factor inhibitor) reduced the risk of death by 42% and extended mPFS and mOS by 2.5 and 5.8 mo (median follow-up 15.6 mo), respectively.…”
Section: Combination Of Immune Agents and Anti-angiogenic Drug Therapiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The combination of atezolizumab and bevacizumab showed a promising antitumor ability with acceptable side effect in treatment of untreated unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. The reported response rate was 36%, and the median progression free survival was 7 months ( 141 ). Another global, multicenter, phase 3 randomized trial, IMbrave150 showed us inspiring results.…”
Section: Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%