2009
DOI: 10.1136/jech.2008.085316
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Randomised controlled trial of paper, online and SMS diaries for collecting sexual behaviour information from young people

Abstract: SMS is a convenient and timely method of collecting brief behavioural data, but online data collection was preferable to most participants and more likely to be complete. Data collected in retrospective sexual behaviour questionnaires were found to agree substantially with data collected through weekly self-reported diaries.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
68
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
2
68
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Upon closer examination, we excluded 2 articles that used PDAs but did not transmit data using the internet17 18 and 10 articles that did not measure sexual risk behaviours as per our eligibility criteria 19–28. This left 23 articles representing 15 studies that used web-based diaries to examine sexual risk behaviour 2 3 29–49…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Upon closer examination, we excluded 2 articles that used PDAs but did not transmit data using the internet17 18 and 10 articles that did not measure sexual risk behaviours as per our eligibility criteria 19–28. This left 23 articles representing 15 studies that used web-based diaries to examine sexual risk behaviour 2 3 29–49…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One compared web-based diaries with text message and paper diaries,2 while another compared diary schedules 33. Four assessed the validity of retrospective recall surveys 2 32 33 37…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The most common approach is to exclude participants without mobiles from data collection, either by using mobile 58 telephone number registries for initial contact and recruitment (e.g. Bexelius et al (2009), Chib et al (2012), Gold et al 59 (2011), Lim et al (2010)), or excluding non-mobile owners after initial contact and screening (e.g. Axén et al (2013), 60 Devine et al (2014), Suffoletto et al (2011)).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%