2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.acpain.2009.10.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Randomised clinical trial of the influence of local subcutaneous infiltration versus subcutaneous and deep infiltration of local anaesthetic on pain after appendicectomy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Under general anesthesia, after complete preparation of the operation field, intervening drugs (10 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine or normal saline) were infiltrated into the subcutaneous tis-sue around the umbilicus just before the incision [13,14]. The incision was made transumbilically from the upper to lower edge.…”
Section: Local Anesthetic Intervention Protocol and Surgical Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Under general anesthesia, after complete preparation of the operation field, intervening drugs (10 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine or normal saline) were infiltrated into the subcutaneous tis-sue around the umbilicus just before the incision [13,14]. The incision was made transumbilically from the upper to lower edge.…”
Section: Local Anesthetic Intervention Protocol and Surgical Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subcutaneous fat was divided bluntly down to the fascia. After identifying the linea alba, the needle was advanced deep to anterior rectus fascia about 2-3 mm on both sides and another 10 mL of drugs was infiltrated [13,15]. The fascia incision was made by electrocautery down to the peritoneum.…”
Section: Local Anesthetic Intervention Protocol and Surgical Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%