2008
DOI: 10.1007/s10955-008-9609-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Random Walk Weakly Attracted to a Wall

Abstract: We consider a random walk X n in Z + , starting at X 0 = x ≥ 0, with transition probabilitiesand X n+1 = 1 whenever X n = 0. We prove EX n ∼ const. n 1− δ 2 as n ր ∞ when δ ∈ (1, 2). The proof is based upon the Karlin-McGregor spectral representation, which is made explicit for this random walk.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
(3 reference statements)
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Huillet [23] gives sharper versions of our Theorems 2.2, 2.3, and 2.6 in this special case: see Propositions 2, 9, 10, and 11 of [23]. The main result of [12] (see also Proposition 15 of [23]) is that, for δ ∈ (1, 2), E[X t ] ∼ K δ t 1− δ 2 , being one possible measure of the spatial extent of the polymer. Perhaps more natural (certainly more readily interpreted in terms of path properties) are the quantities max 1≤s≤t X s and t −1 t s=1 X s that we study in the present paper; their scaling exponents for the case δ ∈ (1, 2) are 1 1+δ (our Theorem 2.6, or Proposition 10 of [23]) and 2−δ 1+δ (our Corollary 2.1) respectively.…”
Section: Random Walk Models Of Polymers and Interfacesmentioning
confidence: 78%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Huillet [23] gives sharper versions of our Theorems 2.2, 2.3, and 2.6 in this special case: see Propositions 2, 9, 10, and 11 of [23]. The main result of [12] (see also Proposition 15 of [23]) is that, for δ ∈ (1, 2), E[X t ] ∼ K δ t 1− δ 2 , being one possible measure of the spatial extent of the polymer. Perhaps more natural (certainly more readily interpreted in terms of path properties) are the quantities max 1≤s≤t X s and t −1 t s=1 X s that we study in the present paper; their scaling exponents for the case δ ∈ (1, 2) are 1 1+δ (our Theorem 2.6, or Proposition 10 of [23]) and 2−δ 1+δ (our Corollary 2.1) respectively.…”
Section: Random Walk Models Of Polymers and Interfacesmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Much of the existing work is restricted to nearest-neighbour random walks on Z + , where explicit calculations are facilitated by reversibility and associated algebraic structure (such as Karlin-McGregor theory [26]); see e.g. [1,12,23] for models inspired directly by random polymers, and e.g. [11,18,40] for related work.…”
Section: Random Walk Models Of Polymers and Interfacesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…[5,6]), particularly in the context of modelling random polymers (see e.g. [3,9]). The study of continuous-time analogues of the general Lamperti problem seems to have begun only recently: see e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%