1992
DOI: 10.1080/00036849200000037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Random Walk or Bandwagon: Some Evidence From Foreign Exchanges in the 1980s

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar arguments in FX markets have motivated claims that FX rates follow random walks, implying that it would be quite difficult for anybody to make rate predictions at above-chance accuracy levels (e.g., Mussa, 1979). But findings contradicting the random-walk view have also been reported (e.g., Lai & Pauly, 1992), along with various models predicting forecasting performance consistent with those reports (e.g., Sarantis & Stewart, 1995). Thus, a priori, it is by no means obvious what accuracy expectations ought to be.…”
mentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Similar arguments in FX markets have motivated claims that FX rates follow random walks, implying that it would be quite difficult for anybody to make rate predictions at above-chance accuracy levels (e.g., Mussa, 1979). But findings contradicting the random-walk view have also been reported (e.g., Lai & Pauly, 1992), along with various models predicting forecasting performance consistent with those reports (e.g., Sarantis & Stewart, 1995). Thus, a priori, it is by no means obvious what accuracy expectations ought to be.…”
mentioning
confidence: 83%
“…See also Lai and Pauly (1992). In contrast, using a shorter sample Taylor and Allen (1990) fail to reject a static null hypothesis against any particular alternative for four of six individual forecasters.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17 See also Lai and Pauly (1992). In contrast, using a shorter sample Taylor and Allen (1990) fail to reject a static null hypothesis against any particular alternative for four of six individual forecasters.…”
Section: What Matters and When Does It Matter?mentioning
confidence: 97%