1992
DOI: 10.1063/1.463820
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Random sequential adsorption of anisotropic particles. I. Jamming limit and asymptotic behavior

Abstract: We study the random sequential adsorption (RSA) of unoriented anisotropic objects onto a flat uniform surface, for various shapes (spherocylinders, ellipses, rectangles, and needles) and elongations. The asymptotic approach to the jamming limit is shown to follow the expected algebraic behavior, 0(03)-0(t)-t-1'3, where 8 is the surface coverage; this result is valid for all shapes and elongations, provided the objects have a nonzero proper area. In the limit of very small elongations, the long-time behavior co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

9
177
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 181 publications
(186 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
9
177
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The lowest values are obtain for square dimer. In this last case the θ max is smaller than for rectangles (0.55) 16,18 as well as for disks (0.5470) 15 . In all cases it is smaller than value for ellipsoids or 16 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The lowest values are obtain for square dimer. In this last case the θ max is smaller than for rectangles (0.55) 16,18 as well as for disks (0.5470) 15 . In all cases it is smaller than value for ellipsoids or 16 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Thus, for RSA of disks on two dimensional flat surface d = 2 but for anisotropic particles d = 3 as an orientation of a particle is an additional degree of freedom. It is worth noting, that even when particle anisotropy is very small, d = 3 describes the ultimate asymptotic behavior 16,22,29 .…”
Section: Rsa Kineticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Again, attention should be called to the fact that there is some uncertainty about the value of J taken from Ref. 23. If we take M sat ͑meas͒ as corresponding to the definitive jamming limit, and assume that the rods are really lying with their long axes strictly parallel to the substratum, then J = M sat ͑meas͒ a ͑actual͒ / m = 0.56, a value that is far higher than the highest value found in Ref.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Approximate analytical expressions for the addition of elongated objects such as spherocylinders ͑cylinders with spherical ends͒ to a surface have been constructed, 23,24 and tested using numerical simulations, with fairly satisfactory results, but the model has apparently never been subjected to experimental test, despite its great practical value, since many nano-objects and micrometer-scale objects such as bacteria are highly elongated rather than spherical. Hence, a secondary purpose of the present work is to test the validity of this model.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%