Random Sampling of Quantum States: a Survey of Methods

Abstract

The numerical generation of random quantum states (RQS) is an important procedure for investigations in quantum information science. Here we review some methods that may be used for performing that task. We start by presenting a simple procedure for generating random state vectors, for which the main tool is the random sampling of unbiased discrete probability distributions (DPD). Afterwards the creation of random density matrices is addressed. In this context we first present the standard method, which consists in using the spectral decomposition of a quantum state for getting RQS from random DPDs and random unitary matrices. In the sequence the Bloch vector parametrization method is described. This approach, despite being useful in several instances, is not in general convenient for RQS generation. In the last part of the article we regard the overparametrized method (OPM) and the related Ginibre and Bures techniques. The OPM can be used to create random positive semidefinite matrices with unit trace from randomly produced general complex matrices in a simple way that is friendly for numerical implementations. We consider a physically relevant issue related to the possible domains that may be used for the real and imaginary parts of the elements of such general complex matrices. Subsequently a too fast concentration of measure in the quantum state space that appears in this parametrization is noticed.

Microscopic foundation of the second law of thermodynamics within nonunitary Newtonian gravity

“…To the purpose of our numerical implementation, the simple algorithm described in Ref. [29] is used. At time t, assuming a complete isolation of the body, we get…”

Entanglement characterization using quantum designs

“…In order to sample mixed quantum states different strategies have been studied in the literature. One way is to draw a random pure state from a higher dimensional Hilbert space and subsequently trace over the extended dimensions [54]. This approach leads to random states which are not homogeneously enough distributed in the space spanned by the moments R (2) and R (4) .…”

Numerical and exact analyses of Bures and Hilbert–Schmidt separability and PPT probabilities

“…It would be of substantial interest to compare/contrast the relative merits of our quasirandom estimations above of the two-rebit and two-qubit Bures separability probabilities in the 36-and 64-dimensional settings employed with earlier studies (largely involving Euler-angle parameterizations of 4 × 4 density matrices [66]), in which 9-and 15-dimensional integration problems were addressed [45,67] (cf. [68]). In the higher-dimensional frameworks used here, the integrands are effectively unity, with each randomly generated matrix being effectively assigned equal weight, while not so in the other cases indicated.…”