Readings in Computer Vision 1987
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-08-051581-6.50070-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Random Sample Consensus: A Paradigm for Model Fitting with Applications to Image Analysis and Automated Cartography

Abstract: Public reporting burden for the collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
9,877
1
104

Year Published

1997
1997
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7,974 publications
(10,585 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
12
9,877
1
104
Order By: Relevance
“…A likely edge point is where the derivative of the smoothed signal first exceeds some threshold. The edge could then be found by applying the RANSAC line detection algorithm to these likely edge points [6]. For a linear probe, the correction is a translation of each likely edge point toward the probe face; the axial coordinates v of the points are multiplied by the temperature correction factor t = In the scenario of a curvilinear probe, the plane appears as a curve rather than a line.…”
Section: Speed Of Soundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A likely edge point is where the derivative of the smoothed signal first exceeds some threshold. The edge could then be found by applying the RANSAC line detection algorithm to these likely edge points [6]. For a linear probe, the correction is a translation of each likely edge point toward the probe face; the axial coordinates v of the points are multiplied by the temperature correction factor t = In the scenario of a curvilinear probe, the plane appears as a curve rather than a line.…”
Section: Speed Of Soundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Displacement continuity is enforced within the frame by using a quality guided matching process [5]. The window location estimates are then processed by a Random Sample Consensus (RANSAC) algorithm [9] to exclude outliers, further enforcing continuity. The robustness provided by the RANSAC algorithm is particularly important to maintain accuracy in the elevational direction, where the 2D matching windows cannot easily distinguish the best matching reference frame from adjacent frames.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If a checkerboard or similar is used instead of the custom registration target, the detected features (e.g., checkerboard corners) are located at positions neighboring both white and black regions. As this can introduce incorrect distance readings by PMD cameras, the plane of the checkerboard is determined from the averaged depth image using a constrained RANSAC [9]. At each 2D position indicated by feature detection above, the corresponding depth value is retrieved and projected onto the plane.…”
Section: Registration Of Depth Cameras With Respect To An Optical Tramentioning
confidence: 99%