1970
DOI: 10.14228/jpr.v2i2.158
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Random Perforator Flap : Some Experiences with Keystone Flap

Abstract: Background: In reconstructing challenging defects, surgeons are considered fairly fortunate when they are able to obtain a similar donor tissue quality to that of the missing tissue; in regards to their color, texture, size, and the ease of donor transfer to the defect. Several methods may be used, which frequently include the free tissue transfers using microvascular anastomoses bearing their specific consequences. We report a select of challenging cases which were successfully rec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 1 publication
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because it is a multiperforator flap, no specific vascular pedicle needs to be determined. In the insetting phase, the flap is moved by advancement or transposition to close defect, sutured from center to edge by ensuring free tension, and a drainage tube is inserted in the inferior part of defect 10 (Fig. 1 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because it is a multiperforator flap, no specific vascular pedicle needs to be determined. In the insetting phase, the flap is moved by advancement or transposition to close defect, sutured from center to edge by ensuring free tension, and a drainage tube is inserted in the inferior part of defect 10 (Fig. 1 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%