2016
DOI: 10.1155/2016/1436364
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Random Parameter Negative Binomial Model of Signalized Intersections

Abstract: Factors affecting accident frequencies at 72 signalized intersections in the Gyeonggi-Do (province) over a four-year period (2007~2010) were explored using the random parameters negative binomial model. The empirical results from the comparison with fixed parameters binomial model show that the random parameters model outperforms its fixed parameters counterpart and provides a fuller understanding of the factors which determine accident frequencies at signalized intersections. In addition, elasticity and margi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This phenomenon strongly verifies that the random parameters method can effectively capture the inter-samples heterogeneity and thus obtain a better goodness of fit. We are not surprised by this result because too many studies [13]- [18], [61]- [63] have shown that the random parameters models outperform the traditional fixed parameters models in fitting urban road crash data, rural road crash data, and expressway crash data. The superiority of the spatial-temporal model for addressing spatial-temporal heterogeneity existing in the tunnel crash dataset can be reflected by comparing the goodness of fit of the RPNBL, the SP-RPNBL, and the ST-RPNBL models.…”
Section: B Model Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This phenomenon strongly verifies that the random parameters method can effectively capture the inter-samples heterogeneity and thus obtain a better goodness of fit. We are not surprised by this result because too many studies [13]- [18], [61]- [63] have shown that the random parameters models outperform the traditional fixed parameters models in fitting urban road crash data, rural road crash data, and expressway crash data. The superiority of the spatial-temporal model for addressing spatial-temporal heterogeneity existing in the tunnel crash dataset can be reflected by comparing the goodness of fit of the RPNBL, the SP-RPNBL, and the ST-RPNBL models.…”
Section: B Model Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Safety engineers and planners have utilized the crash prediction model/safety performance function (SPF) as a beneficial tool to analyse and enhance the level of road safety. In recent years, using these methods, intensive studies have been conducted to investigate the impact of various geometric design parameters and traffic volume at intersections on safety (Park et al 2016;Anjana & Anjaneyulu 2015;Abdul Manan et al 2013;HSM 2010;Yan et al 2005). However, the influences of these parameters have not been explicitly quantified in roundabout vicinity, especially in non-lane-based traffic conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the GPS data and the advance warning message data from Hong Kong-Zhuhai-Macau Bridge (HZMB) shuttle buses, this study first analysed the temporal and spatial distribution of the risky behaviour of bus drivers, then developed random parameters negative binomial models to provide a deep understanding of contributing factors to risky behaviours, such as driving close to the front vehicle, and lane departure. This model is statistically superior to the fixed parameters negative binomial approach, as it captures the possible unobserved factors [23,24]. The findings of this study will shed light on bus operators to better understand their risky behaviour, and, therefore, allow special training in driving behaviour to provide a better and safer service.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…To identify the contributing factors to risky behaviours, count data models were used in this study. As two categories of the most frequently used approach, a Poisson model and negative binomial model have been commonly applied in count data modelling [23,26,27]. Poisson distribution is relatively easy to interpret.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%