1998
DOI: 10.1109/98.667945
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Random multiple access of broadcast channels with Pareto distributed packet interarrival times

Abstract: We consider the random multiple access of a slotted broadcast communication channel. Packet arrivals for such channels are often modeled as Poisson processes because the latter have attractive theoretical properties and are well understood, even though a number of tra c studies have shown that packet interarrival times are not always exponentially distributed. For example, recent studies argue convincingly that tra c from a variety of working packet networks (e.g., LANs, WANs, e.t.c), is much better modeled us… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In this paper, we show that when the LRD traffic is not very bursty, the performance of the random-access channel can be much better than that produced under Poisson traffic loading; otherwise, a distinct performance degradation takes place. In light of these results, we conclude that neither the LRD Telnet arrival processes used by Aracil and Munoz [13] nor the Pareto traffic processes used by Harpantidou and Paterakis [14] are very bursty. In fact, by re-examining the model used in the latter paper, we have found that in constructing the Pareto traffic model, Harpantidou and Paterakis have selected the parameters for the Pareto traffic model in such a way that the modeled traffic becomes less and less bursty when the channel loading gets heavier.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this paper, we show that when the LRD traffic is not very bursty, the performance of the random-access channel can be much better than that produced under Poisson traffic loading; otherwise, a distinct performance degradation takes place. In light of these results, we conclude that neither the LRD Telnet arrival processes used by Aracil and Munoz [13] nor the Pareto traffic processes used by Harpantidou and Paterakis [14] are very bursty. In fact, by re-examining the model used in the latter paper, we have found that in constructing the Pareto traffic model, Harpantidou and Paterakis have selected the parameters for the Pareto traffic model in such a way that the modeled traffic becomes less and less bursty when the channel loading gets heavier.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Furthermore, one expects such LRD properties to have a significant impact on the performance of Aloha-based channels as well. This issue has been recently studied by Aracil and Munoz [13] and by Harpantidou and Paterakis [14]. By employing LRD real Telnet packet-arrival processes as input traffic, Aracil and Munoz have found that the Aloha channel actually performs much better than that loaded by a Poisson traffic.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Therefore, multi-layer adaptive techniques are being pursued to coordinate the resource management task among protocols at multiple layers within the communications architecture [7,8]. Finally, due to the complexities inherent in modeling a heterogeneous mobile network, simulation has become a primary method for performance analysis of mobile network protocols [4,5,8,9,10,11,12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1) The aggregate data message arrivals are Poisson distributed with mean λ messages per frame, and 2) the interarrival times of the aggregate data message arrival process are assumed independent, and identically distributed according to a Pareto distribution with shape parameter α and location parameter k. We use the bursty Pareto model because it simulates well data traffic generated by interactive applications, the importance of which is growing and will be even more significant in future mobile systems [20,21]. The location parameter k corresponds to the minimum interarrival time between packets.…”
Section: Data Traffic Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%