2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10854-019-01289-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Random laser materials: from ultrahigh efficiency to very low threshold (Anderson localization)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The lasing threshold of GCCaF shows the highest value because of the small fluoride phase droplet as well as the small crystal size and low crystallinity. In contrast, GCSrF shows the best lasing performance with the lowest threshold value, which can be explained by the larger fluoride phase separation droplet, crystal size, and higher crystallinity 75 . Although GCBaF should have been the best random lasing candidate among these three samples theoretically, the interpenetrated fluoride phase and the co‐existence of two crystalline phases (BaF 2 and BaAlF 5 ) disrupt the light path during the optical feedback process, resulting in the higher threshold 76 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The lasing threshold of GCCaF shows the highest value because of the small fluoride phase droplet as well as the small crystal size and low crystallinity. In contrast, GCSrF shows the best lasing performance with the lowest threshold value, which can be explained by the larger fluoride phase separation droplet, crystal size, and higher crystallinity 75 . Although GCBaF should have been the best random lasing candidate among these three samples theoretically, the interpenetrated fluoride phase and the co‐existence of two crystalline phases (BaF 2 and BaAlF 5 ) disrupt the light path during the optical feedback process, resulting in the higher threshold 76 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In contrast, GCSrF shows the best lasing performance with the lowest threshold value, which can be explained by the larger fluoride phase separation droplet, crystal size, and higher crystallinity. 75 Although GCBaF should have been the best F I G U R E 5 Photoluminescence (PL) excitation and emission spectra of Er 3+ (A), Eu 3+ (B) and Eu 2+ (C). In (C), λ ex = 340 nm for GBaF, λ ex = 290 nm for GCBaF, and excitation spectra of G/GCBaF were monitored at 445 nm.…”
Section: Selective Enrichment Of Rare Earth Ions To Enhance Luminesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are so-called random lasers where an electromagnetic (EM) field propagates through a disordered medium possessing the gain [50]. Technically, for random lasers, we can exploit a number of disordered materials, which provide light diffusion and amplification; see, e.g., [51]. In Figure 2, we represent a sketch of a random laser operating in two physically well-distinguished limits.…”
Section: Random Lasersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively, it has also been possible to control the random laser through the socalled post-control, being carried out by controlling external parameters such as the temperature, shed electric field, and optics (Ye et al, 2017). As for the random laser directionality, several techniques have been utilized to control this important characteristic using optical waveguides, lowdimensional cavities, and a specific structure for the random laser (Turitsyn et al, 2014;Schönhuber et al, 2016;Wetter and Jimenez-Villar 2019;Kumar et al, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%