2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2016.08.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Random forest regression for magnetic resonance image synthesis

Abstract: By choosing different pulse sequences and their parameters, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can generate a large variety of tissue contrasts. This very flexibility, however, can yield inconsistencies with MRI acquisitions across datasets or scanning sessions that can in turn cause inconsistent automated image analysis. Although image synthesis of MR images has been shown to be helpful in addressing this problem, an inability to synthesize both T2-weighted brain images that include the skull and FLuid Attenuat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
130
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 170 publications
(135 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
130
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The multi-output decision trees implementation has similarities to output kernel trees (Geurts et al, 2007). Predicting entire neighborhoods gives further context information such as the presence of lesions predominantly inside WM, which has been shown to improve patch based methods (Jog et al, 2017). This approach was originally presented in Jog et al (2015).…”
Section: Methods Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The multi-output decision trees implementation has similarities to output kernel trees (Geurts et al, 2007). Predicting entire neighborhoods gives further context information such as the presence of lesions predominantly inside WM, which has been shown to improve patch based methods (Jog et al, 2017). This approach was originally presented in Jog et al (2015).…”
Section: Methods Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The unimodal (singleinput, single-output, one-to-one) method we compare against is pGAN [28], while the multimodal (many-to-one) models being REPLICA [22] (in a multi-input setting), and that of Chartsias et al [5], called MM-Synthesis hereafter. Both pGAN and MM-Synthesis were recently published (2019 and 2018), and they outperform all other methods before them (MM-Synthesis outperforms LSDN [27], Modality Propagation [14], and REPLICA [22], while pGAN outperforms both REPLICA and MM-Synthesis in one-to-one synthesis). To the best of our knowledge, we did not find any other methods that claimed to outperform either pGAN or MM-Synthesis, and so decided to evaluate our method against them.…”
Section: Benchmark Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method utilized global context of the input sequence by taking a full slice as input. Recently, Jog et al [22] propose a random forest based method that learns intensity mapping between input patches centered around a voxel extracted from a single pulse sequence, and the intensity of corresponding voxel in target sequence. The method utilized multi-resolution patches by building a Gaussian pyramid of the input sequence.…”
Section: A Unimodal Synthesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These intensity pairs and their voxel-wise features, along with their labels provide the training data for regressors that predict the intensity of the target modality given the features of the input modality. Our features consist of 3 × 3 × 3 image patches together with average image values in patches forming a constellation around the given voxel (“context features” similar to those in [2, 10]). We need 2 × K regressors, one each per modality and cluster.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%