Random Forest Classification of Wetland Landcovers from Multi-Sensor Data in the Arid Region of Xinjiang, China

Abstract

Abstract:The wetland classification from remotely sensed data is usually difficult due to the extensive seasonal vegetation dynamics and hydrological fluctuation. This study presents a random forest classification approach for the retrieval of the wetland landcover in the arid regions by fusing the Pléiade-1B data with multi-date Landsat-8 data. The segmentation of the Pléiade-1B multispectral image data was performed based on an object-oriented approach, and the geometric and spectral features were extracted for the segmented image objects. The normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) series data were also calculated from the multi-date Landsat-8 data, reflecting vegetation phenological changes in its growth cycle. The feature set extracted from the two sensors data was optimized and employed to create the random forest model for the classification of the wetland landcovers in the Ertix River in northern Xinjiang, China. Comparison with other classification methods such as support vector machine and artificial neural network classifiers indicates that the random forest classifier can achieve accurate classification with an overall accuracy of 93% and the Kappa coefficient of 0.92. The classification accuracy of the farming lands and water bodies that have distinct boundaries with the surrounding land covers was improved 5%-10% by making use of the property of geometric shapes. To remove the difficulty in the classification that was caused by the similar spectral features of the vegetation covers, the phenological difference and the textural information of co-occurrence gray matrix were incorporated into the classification, and the main wetland vegetation covers in the study area were derived from the two sensors data. The inclusion of phenological information in the classification enables the classification errors being reduced down, and the overall accuracy was improved approximately 10%. The results show that the proposed random forest classification by fusing multi-sensor data can retrieve better wetland landcover information than the other classifiers, which is significant for the monitoring and management of the wetland ecological resources in arid areas.

Nominal 30-m Cropland Extent Map of Continental Africa by Integrating Pixel-Based and Object-Based Algorithms Using Sentinel-2 and Landsat-8 Data on Google Earth Engine

“…It is more robust, relatively faster in speed of classification, and easier to implement than many other classifiers [77]. Accurate land cover classification and better performance of the RF models have been described by many researchers [11,[77][78][79].…”

“…The two most applied remote sensing methods for land-cover mapping are manual classification based on visual interpretation [10] and digital per-pixel classification [11]. Although the human capacity for interpreting images is remarkable, visual interpretation is subjective, time-consuming, and expensive on large area.…”

Forest Type Identification with Random Forest Using Sentinel-1A, Sentinel-2A, Multi-Temporal Landsat-8 and DEM Data

“…RF is an integrated learning method based on a decision tree, which is combined with many ensemble regression or classification trees [29] and uses a bagging or bootstrap algorithm to build a large number of different training subsets [41,42]. Each decision tree gives a classification result for the samples not chosen as training samples.…”

One-Class Classification of Airborne LiDAR Data in Urban Areas Using a Presence and Background Learning Algorithm

“…The eigenvectors (V 1 , V 2 , V 3 ) and eigenvalues (λ 1 ≥ λ 2 ≥ λ 3 ≥ 0) can be derived using the eigen-decomposition method, which is shown in Equation (2).…”

“…Airborne light detection and ranging (LiDAR) is becoming a particularly important technology for the acquisition of accurate three-dimensional (3D) spatial data [1], with applications including land cover surveys [2], forestry parameter estimation [3], and 3D city modeling [4]. Since LiDAR data are discrete unstructured points, classification of LiDAR point cloud is an essential procedure before further data processing and model construction.…”