2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.04.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Random Forest based hourly building energy prediction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
138
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 438 publications
(170 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
138
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, small nodesize increases the accuracy of RF classification, but it takes more time. Based on previous studies, this paper set nodesize as 5 [33].…”
Section: Important Parameters Of Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, small nodesize increases the accuracy of RF classification, but it takes more time. Based on previous studies, this paper set nodesize as 5 [33].…”
Section: Important Parameters Of Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The differences between the methods described above and our method are as follows: The forecasting models in previous studies [19][20][21][22] presented excellent prediction performance using a sufficient data set of target buildings. However, our forecasting model can exhibit a satisfactory prediction performance even if the electric load data of the target building is insufficient.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…They confirmed that time factors were essential Energies 2020, 13, 886 3 of 37 variables to build the prediction models; moreover, the GBM model exhibited better prediction performance than other models. Wang et al [20] presented an hourly electric energy consumption forecasting model for two institutional buildings based on RF. They considered time factors, weather conditions, and the number of occupants as the input variables of the RF model.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Machine learning, a subfield of artificial intelligence (AI), in contrast typically applies an algorithmic approach (which may non-linearly transform the data), in order to provide a forecast [6]. Many such algorithms have shown to be effective for forecasting and include decision trees [7], random forest [8,9], gradient boosting machines [10], k-nearest neighbors [11], case-based reasoning [12], support vector machines [13], etc.…”
Section: Of 27mentioning
confidence: 99%