2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119238
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Random forest-based evaluation technique for internal damage in reinforced concrete featuring multiple nondestructive testing results

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, to demonstrate the JSO-SVC predictive performance, the random forest classification (RFC) model [79] and convolutional neural network (CNN) models [80] have been employed as benchmark approaches. e RFC and CNN are selected for result comparison in this study because these two machine learning approaches have been successfully applied in various works related to computer vision-based or nondestructive testing-based structural health monitoring/diagnosis [14,26,[81][82][83][84][85][86][87][88].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, to demonstrate the JSO-SVC predictive performance, the random forest classification (RFC) model [79] and convolutional neural network (CNN) models [80] have been employed as benchmark approaches. e RFC and CNN are selected for result comparison in this study because these two machine learning approaches have been successfully applied in various works related to computer vision-based or nondestructive testing-based structural health monitoring/diagnosis [14,26,[81][82][83][84][85][86][87][88].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors have already published crack detection [ 28 ] and nondestructive inspection methods [ 29 ] using decision tree-based algorithms such as Random Forest. In this section, however, the authors will also summarize the theory of Random Forest for the convenience of the reader.…”
Section: Machine Learning Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The present method is positioned as one that can obtain the crack ratio correctly unlike object detection methods such as SSD, and the effort of annotation is much smaller compared to semantic segmentation techniques such as Mask R-CNN. Based on our experience in [21][22][23][24][25][26] with research on damage detection using machine learning and deep learning, we believe that to improve the accuracy of deep learning, it is necessary not only to increase the amount of data but also to improve the quality of the training data. Therefore, in this study, we develop a framework to focus on training of types of images that are difficult to detect, from the viewpoint of improving the training performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%