2015
DOI: 10.1142/s0219519415400254
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Random Forest Based Classification of Medical X-Ray Images Using a Genetic Algorithm for Feature Selection

Abstract: Automated classification of medical images is an increasingly important tool for physicians in their daily activities. However, due to its computational complexity, this task is one of the major current challenges in the field of content-based image retrieval (CBIR). In this paper, a medical image classification approach is proposed. This method is composed of two main phases. The first step consists of a pre-processing, where a texture and shape based features vector is extracted. Also, a feature selection ap… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…RF outperformed other classifiers on both the training and test set, which is consistent with its popularity among many previous medical image analysis studies [ 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 ]. Several features of RF may contribute to its higher performance on medical images—RFs are suited for high predictor dimension relative to sample size, they inherently perform feature selection, and they generalize well to regions of the feature space with sparse data [ 34 , 35 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…RF outperformed other classifiers on both the training and test set, which is consistent with its popularity among many previous medical image analysis studies [ 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 ]. Several features of RF may contribute to its higher performance on medical images—RFs are suited for high predictor dimension relative to sample size, they inherently perform feature selection, and they generalize well to regions of the feature space with sparse data [ 34 , 35 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…We implemented a number of traditional machine learning methods including linear discriminant analysis (LDA), support vector machines (SVM), multilayer perceptron neural networks (MLP), random forest (RF) and gradient boosting (XGB) via XGBoost [89]. These machine learning methods have demonstrated effectiveness with the semantic segmentation of images across a number of disciplines including bioimage analysis [87,[90][91][92][93][94][95][96] and remote sensing [97][98][99][100][101][102]. Notably, classifier models trained with ensemble methods such as random forest and gradient boosting benefit from a relatively high level of interpretability [103][104][105] as the individual estimators (decision trees) within these models can be understood and interpreted without significant effort.…”
Section: Non-deep Machine Learning Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We first implemented random forest and gradient boosting via XGBoost [71], two ensemble machine learning methods that have proven effective with the semantic segmentation of images across a number of disciplines including bioimage analysis [72][73][74][75][76][77][78][79] and remote sensing [80][81][82][83][84][85]. Unlike neural networks and deep learning methods, models trained with these algorithms benefit from simplicity and a relatively high level of interpretability [86][87][88].…”
Section: Random Forest and Gradient Boostingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This technique is a collection of classification and regression trees [101]. Here, a forest of classification trees is generated, where each tree is grown on a bootstrap sample of the data [102]. In that way, the RF classifier consists of a collection of binary classifiers where each decision tree casts a unit vote for the most popular class label (see Figure 9d) [103].…”
Section: Random Forest (Rf)mentioning
confidence: 99%