1975
DOI: 10.1080/05695557508975009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Random Flow in Queueing Networks: A Review and Critique

Abstract: This paper introduces basic properties of queueing networks. Networks are classified by their queue length vector processes as being Markov processes or not. In each case the relevant problems are exposed and the literature of each problem is surveyed. The paper concludes with a discussion of the results, and some points in need of further research are established.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

1979
1979
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 86 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For problem #1 both surrogates g and h specify buffer allocations of (3,4,5) and generate a system reliability (simulated for 100,000 cycles) at 331. In [ I 61 eight different alternatives are tested for problem #I, the best of which is (2,3,7). The buffer allocation of (2, 3, 7) provides a system reliability (computed analytically in 1161) of .833.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For problem #1 both surrogates g and h specify buffer allocations of (3,4,5) and generate a system reliability (simulated for 100,000 cycles) at 331. In [ I 61 eight different alternatives are tested for problem #I, the best of which is (2,3,7). The buffer allocation of (2, 3, 7) provides a system reliability (computed analytically in 1161) of .833.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1980), and Lin and Kumar (1984). Disney (1975), Lemoine (1977) and Stidham (1985) survey the methodological research in this area. Many of these studies stress the significant reduction in production flow times which are possible through the use of dynamic assignment strategies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It follows from Equation (2) that an estimate of intensity 1  can be calculated from bootstrap samples as…”
Section: Nonparametric Statistical Inference Of Intensitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intensity 1  and 2  can be interpreted as expected number of arrivals per mean service time. The condition for stability of the system is both 1  , 2  are less unity. Basic properties of queueing networks are introduced in Disney [1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation