2020
DOI: 10.1007/s40534-020-00219-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Random dynamic analysis of vertical train–bridge systems under small probability by surrogate model and subset simulation with splitting

Abstract: The response of the train–bridge system has an obvious random behavior. A high traffic density and a long maintenance period of a track will result in a substantial increase in the number of trains running on a bridge, and there is small likelihood that the maximum responses of the train and bridge happen in the total maintenance period of the track. Firstly, the coupling model of train–bridge systems is reviewed. Then, an ensemble method is presented, which can estimate the small probabilities of a dynamic sy… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the time-domain method can consider the effect of various factors comprehensively, it is still difficult to evaluate the reliability of the train-bridge system. Therefore, an increasing number of random vibration methods are proposed recently, which includes the probability density evolution method (PDEM) [18], pseudoexcitation method (PEM) [19][20][21], statistical linearization [22], surrogate model approach [23,24], subset simulation [25], new point estimation method [26] and other theories or methods [27,28].…”
Section: Train-bridge Coupling Vibration Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the time-domain method can consider the effect of various factors comprehensively, it is still difficult to evaluate the reliability of the train-bridge system. Therefore, an increasing number of random vibration methods are proposed recently, which includes the probability density evolution method (PDEM) [18], pseudoexcitation method (PEM) [19][20][21], statistical linearization [22], surrogate model approach [23,24], subset simulation [25], new point estimation method [26] and other theories or methods [27,28].…”
Section: Train-bridge Coupling Vibration Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The extreme value CDF is mainly used to establish the limit value of the derailment factor within the service life of a bridge, where n is the number of times a train runs over the bridge. Within the service life of the bridge, the total number of train operation can be predicted and the limit value of the derailment factor can be obtained using equation (11). Then, the safety of train operations can be judged by comparing the limit value with the relevant specification.…”
Section: Verification Of Derailment Coefficient Limit Obtained From E...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It mainly focuses on numerical algorithms, vehicle-bridge model optimization, and modeling various external excitations. [2][3][4][5][6][7] The main methods employed in researching the vehiclebridge system random vibrations include the Monte Carlo method (MCM), 8 extremum response surface method, 9 enhance MCM 10 , subset simulations, 11 probability density evolution theory, 12 and pseudo-excitation method (PEM). 13 Yu adopted the probability density evolution theory to study the dynamic response of a bridge considering the randomness of bridge mass, stiffness, and damping, and track irregularity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To realize the modeling and solution of the coupled train-guideway system, MATLAB is used to program the whole process. The train and guideway are regarded as two subsystems, and the corresponding dynamic response is solved by using Newmark- β method (Bao et al, 2021; Han et al, 2019; Xiang et al, 2020). The dynamic analysis of the coupled system mainly includes three steps: (1) the combination of mass, stiffness, and damping matrix of the train system and the guideway system; (2) the calculation of electromagnetic force; (3) the solution of dynamic equation (see Figure 5).…”
Section: Maglev Train-guideway Coupling Vibration Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%