2009
DOI: 10.1109/ted.2009.2022692
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Random-Dopant-Induced Variability in Nano-CMOS Devices and Digital Circuits

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We define transistor delay as We consider the situation where the first term is five times larger than the second, which means that is dominant in . Then, we have (44) In advanced design technology, is decreased to 0.6 ps [26]. Then, when , we have , which means the operation frequency is 190 MHz.…”
Section: B Operation Speed Of Adiabatic Logicmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We define transistor delay as We consider the situation where the first term is five times larger than the second, which means that is dominant in . Then, we have (44) In advanced design technology, is decreased to 0.6 ps [26]. Then, when , we have , which means the operation frequency is 190 MHz.…”
Section: B Operation Speed Of Adiabatic Logicmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the PVE-induced gate length variation (σ L g,PVE ) is obtained, the PVE-induced V th fluctuation (σ V th,PVE ) is calculated by characteristics of the V th roll-off. The detailed simulation techniques for RDF and PVE simulation follow our previous works [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25]. For WKF, a statistically sound Monte Carlo simulation approach is advanced, as shown in figure 1(e).…”
Section: The Statistical Simulation Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, the existing random ITs at the HfO 2 /Si interface weakens the screening effect, in contrast to random dopant fluctuation (RDF). 5) For the same number of ITs, simulated device samples with similar I on but different I off may disclose the effect of random ITs' position on the off-state potential; in particular, ITs near source end alter potential barrier significantly. Large number of random ITs not only implies high density of ITs at HfO 2 /Si interface but also scatters high-field transport of inversion-layer carriers; consequently, it raises V th and impacts the on-state conducting current path, in spite of maintaining similar offstate current.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%