2009
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkp881
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Random DNA fragmentation allows detection of single-copy, single-exon alterations of copy number by oligonucleotide array CGH in clinical FFPE samples

Abstract: Genomic technologies, such as array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH), increasingly offer definitive gene dosage profiles in clinical samples. Historically, copy number profiling was limited to large fresh-frozen tumors where intact DNA could be readily extracted. Genomic analyses of pre-neoplastic tumors and diagnostic biopsies are often limited to DNA processed by formalin-fixation and paraffin-embedding (FFPE). We present specialized protocols for DNA extraction and processing from FFPE tissues utili… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
32
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
4
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several research groups have shown copy number analysis DNA from FFPE tissue on high-resolution, dual channel oligonucleotide array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) arrays (Hostetter et al, 2010;Brosens et al, 2010) and SNP-based platforms (Thompson et al, 2005;Tuefferd et al, 2008;Alvarez et al, 2010) is feasible. Despite these results, large series of highresolution SNP data with DNA from FFPE archival tissue have thus far not been reported.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several research groups have shown copy number analysis DNA from FFPE tissue on high-resolution, dual channel oligonucleotide array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) arrays (Hostetter et al, 2010;Brosens et al, 2010) and SNP-based platforms (Thompson et al, 2005;Tuefferd et al, 2008;Alvarez et al, 2010) is feasible. Despite these results, large series of highresolution SNP data with DNA from FFPE archival tissue have thus far not been reported.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Archival FFPE tissue is often the only source of material for study (Blow 2007). The use of such samples has been challenging due to poor DNA quality; hence, array CGH results, for example, have been variable (Mc Sherry et al 2007;Hostetter et al 2010;Krijgsman et al 2012;Warren et al 2012). To make large archival sample series accessible for genome research, a robust technique is required that performs well on diverse sample types, with high resolution, quality and reproducibility, and at low cost without the necessity for a (matched) normal sample.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20 Oligonucleotide aCGH platforms developed by Agilent or Nimblegen are thus considered as the more robust at tolerating degraded DNA from FFPE tissue samples than SNP arrays. They provide both high resolution and precision for detecting high-level amplifications, single-copy alterations, and resolving chromosomal break points, 20,21 but lack the capacity for detecting copy neutral LOH.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%