2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.artint.2007.04.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Random constraint satisfaction: Easy generation of hard (satisfiable) instances

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
89
0
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 141 publications
(91 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
89
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Random Instances These instances contain random table constraints of random scope generated by the RD-model [22]. Parameters are chosen to generate instances close to the phase transition, using Theorems 1 and 2 from [22].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Random Instances These instances contain random table constraints of random scope generated by the RD-model [22]. Parameters are chosen to generate instances close to the phase transition, using Theorems 1 and 2 from [22].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Parameters are chosen to generate instances close to the phase transition, using Theorems 1 and 2 from [22]. The instances have 10 variables, a uniform domain size of 10, and 15 table constraints of arity 5.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to [35], we started from densities that permit to avoid flawed instances. We consider instances involving 30 and 40 variables having a uniform domain size of 25 and 20.…”
Section: Random Binary Cspsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We carry out experiments to compare CC 2 FS with five state-of-the-art MWDS algorithms on benchmarks in the literatures including unit disk graphs and random generated instances, as well as two classical graphs benchmarks namely BHOSLIB [Xu et al, 2007] and DIMACS [Johnson and Trick, 1996], and a broad range of real world massive graphs with millions of vertices and dozens of millions of edges [Rossi and Ahmed, 2015]. Experimental results show that CC 2 FS significantly outperforms previous algorithms and improves the best known solution quality for some difficult instances.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%