1991
DOI: 10.1007/bf01313410
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Random cluster models for icosahedral phase alloys

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Transformations from the A1MnSi I phase to the cubic a-AlMnSi (Cooper & Robinson, 1966) or the orthorhombic A16Mn (Nicol, 1953) phase were studied by Pannetier, Dubois, Janot & Bride (1987), Koskenmaki, Chen & Rao (1986) and others. Similarities in the intensity distribution in their diffraction patterns were taken as an indication that the I and a phases contain the same basic building block, viz the Mackay icosahedron; an object consisting of 54 atoms: 12Mn + 42(A1 + Si) (Guyot & Audier, 1985;Cahn, Gratias & Mozer, 1988a,b;Duneau & Oguey, 1989;Robertson & Moss, 1991;Yamamoto & Hiraga, 1988). The a phase is termed an approximant to the A1-Mn-Si quasicrystal (Mukhopadyay, Ishihara & Ranganathan 1991), and is used as a guide to the atomic decoration on the quasilattice.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Transformations from the A1MnSi I phase to the cubic a-AlMnSi (Cooper & Robinson, 1966) or the orthorhombic A16Mn (Nicol, 1953) phase were studied by Pannetier, Dubois, Janot & Bride (1987), Koskenmaki, Chen & Rao (1986) and others. Similarities in the intensity distribution in their diffraction patterns were taken as an indication that the I and a phases contain the same basic building block, viz the Mackay icosahedron; an object consisting of 54 atoms: 12Mn + 42(A1 + Si) (Guyot & Audier, 1985;Cahn, Gratias & Mozer, 1988a,b;Duneau & Oguey, 1989;Robertson & Moss, 1991;Yamamoto & Hiraga, 1988). The a phase is termed an approximant to the A1-Mn-Si quasicrystal (Mukhopadyay, Ishihara & Ranganathan 1991), and is used as a guide to the atomic decoration on the quasilattice.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2, slightly ͑''elastically''͒ distorting these cells so that their surfaces are brought into contact, and then ''gluing'' these contacting surfaces in such a way that the coinciding atoms at the ''glued together'' surfaces are united and shared by neighboring units. In order to fill the hollow places in the corners of the construction obtained, let us introduce one more basic unit D 16 (1) by adding 28 atoms above the faces of the 16-coordinated first neighbor shell of Z16. The resulting second shell, shown in Fig.…”
Section: Construction Schemementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is done either analytically, by defining some ''basic'' atomic clusters and then arranging them in space, [11][12][13][14][15][16] or by molecular dynamics ͑MD͒ cooling down of a ''melt.'' 17,18 The advantage of the MD approach is the immediate determination of the relevant atomic positions without any additional assumptions on the geometric laws governing atomic packing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Until now, the location of specific elemental species in the structure has been deduced only indirectly, for example, by the analysis of Patterson functions derived from x-ray and neutron diffraction peak intensities of single-domain samples [3] or by powder diffraction peak intensities [4]. We report here the first observations of x-ray standing waves (XSW) in an aperiodic mediumquasicrystals-and their use to test directly the positions of specific elements in the structure.…”
Section: (Received 28 August 1998)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The determination of the atomic structure of quasicrystals remains one of the most important questions about these remarkable materials. Present theory is concerned with the relationship between cluster models, which give insights into growth and bonding, and planar models, which are testable by diffraction [1][2][3][4]. Even the symmetry of quasicrystals remains a major question.…”
Section: (Received 28 August 1998)mentioning
confidence: 99%