2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosres.2010.12.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Random cascade driven rainfall disaggregation for urban hydrology: An evaluation of six models and a new generator

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
49
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, if the objective were to have rainfall-dependent parameters, excluding the low intensity data would provide no guidance as to which parameter values to actually apply at these low rainfall intensities. In another example of censuring data, Licznar et al (2011a) simply eliminated what would be analogous in our study to all values of Y + = 1 from the empirical frequency distribution, under the assumption that most of these values were artifactual. A third procedure to deal specifically with recording precision is to add random noise to the rainfall observations, with the intent of replacing the information lost by round-off error and thus removing the discretization that leads to an excess of certain values of W + (or Y + ) (Licznar et al, 2011b).…”
Section: Hydrolmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, if the objective were to have rainfall-dependent parameters, excluding the low intensity data would provide no guidance as to which parameter values to actually apply at these low rainfall intensities. In another example of censuring data, Licznar et al (2011a) simply eliminated what would be analogous in our study to all values of Y + = 1 from the empirical frequency distribution, under the assumption that most of these values were artifactual. A third procedure to deal specifically with recording precision is to add random noise to the rainfall observations, with the intent of replacing the information lost by round-off error and thus removing the discretization that leads to an excess of certain values of W + (or Y + ) (Licznar et al, 2011b).…”
Section: Hydrolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This makes characterization of the spatial distribution of rainfall at small time scales critical to evaluating the efficacy of urban stormwater drainage systems. Traditionally, design storms have been used to evaluate these systems in conjunction with rainfall-runoff and hydrodynamic models, but in recent years there has been a push towards stochastically downscaling long (e.g., multi-decadal) time series of coarse (e.g., daily) rainfall to higher resolution (e.g., minutes) with which to force models of stormwater drainage systems (e.g., Hingray and Ben Haha, 2005;Molnar and Burlando, 2005;Licznar et al, 2011a). Advantages of using long time series are that they allow for a statistical analysis of system performance and they eliminate the problem of defining the appropriate initial catchment water storage for a design storm (Hingray and Ben Haha, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Güntner et al, 2001) or a quasi-daily starting timescale (e.g. Licznar et al, 2011). Since this was not an option in this work, the approach of a constant b = 2 was abandoned in favour of a mixed branching with b = 3 for the first cascade level (k = 1), resulting in a timescale of T 2 = 8 h on the second cascade level.…”
Section: Cascade Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Berne et al (2004), rainfall data at a temporal resolution of a few minutes is required for hydrological applications in urban areas. However, for practical and financial reasons, there is a discrepancy between what would be optimal for model input and the data that are available from observations (Berne et al, 2004;Licznar et al, 2011). In situ measurements require a high density of rain gauges to capture the spatial variability, particularly for rain showers associated with local convection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%