2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.cose.2020.102133
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Random CapsNet forest model for imbalanced malware type classification task

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results are shown in Table 5. These approaches include traditional classification approaches [55][56][57], CNN [58,59], ensemble model [48,60], deep forest model [61], and our proposed approaches. As observed in Table 5, MalCaps achieved comparable results to others, and achieved a higher detection rate and macro F1-score.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results are shown in Table 5. These approaches include traditional classification approaches [55][56][57], CNN [58,59], ensemble model [48,60], deep forest model [61], and our proposed approaches. As observed in Table 5, MalCaps achieved comparable results to others, and achieved a higher detection rate and macro F1-score.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As for the cybersecurity field, there are only very few papers in literatures about capsule networks within the malware classification domain. Cayir et al, propose a Random CapsNet for imbalanced malware based on bootstrap aggregating methods [48]. Their RNCF on the dataset achieves a 99.56% accuracy, though an impressive accuracy result, there are arguably two limitations to this paper.…”
Section: Deep Learning Based Malware Detection Approachesmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Khan et al [30] conducted an extensive analysis of transfer learning for malware classification using ResNet and GoogleNet with their data preparation pipeline and the top model. Resnet 18,34,50,101,152 achieved an accuracy of 83%, 86.51%, 86.62%, 85.94%, and 87.98%, respectively. The accuracy for GoogleNet was 84%.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The kernel-based ELM classifier was used for malware classification achieving 94.25% accuracy for the Malimg dataset. Çayır et al [50] adopted the ensemble model of capsule networks (CapsNet). Instead of complex CNN architectures and domain-specific feature engineering techniques, the CapsNet model employs simple architecture engineering.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike these type of ensemble models, Random Transformer Forest (RTF) is a bagging-based ensemble model inspired from the Random Forest (RF) machine learning model [53]. Similar to RF, using an ensemble of pre-trained transformer models is assumed to increase classification performance on highly imbalanced malware datasets rather than using a single pre-trained transformer model [54,55].…”
Section: Proposed Model: Random Transformer Forest (Rtf)mentioning
confidence: 99%