2018
DOI: 10.1007/s11523-018-0562-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ramucirumab as Second-Line Therapy in Metastatic Gastric Cancer: Real-World Data from the RAMoss Study

Abstract: These "real-life" efficacy data on ramucirumab treatment are in line with previous randomized trials. Ramucirumab is well tolerated in daily clinical practice.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
24
2
4

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
5
24
2
4
Order By: Relevance
“…In the second-line setting, patients underwent PR between September 2015 and September 2018 ( Table 1). The results of second-line therapy in this cohort of patients parallel findings in the RAMos study [20]. The overall response rate was 17.5%, with 7 partial responses in the 40 patients.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the second-line setting, patients underwent PR between September 2015 and September 2018 ( Table 1). The results of second-line therapy in this cohort of patients parallel findings in the RAMos study [20]. The overall response rate was 17.5%, with 7 partial responses in the 40 patients.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Italian institutions involved in the RAMos retrospective study [20] were asked to participate in the present study. To evaluate the results of a translational analysis in a homogeneous population of patients, this retrospective investigation focused on patients treated with the combination of ramucirumab and paclitaxel only.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, also patients who are not fit for second line chemotherapy might have a benefit, if treated with ramucirumab as a monotherapy. These promising results were affirmed by the "real-life" efficacy data on ramucirumab treatment in the RAMoss study (median OS 8.0 months; 95% CI 7.09-8.9) [27].…”
Section: Second Linementioning
confidence: 81%
“…Такие клинические факторы, как ECOG ≥ 1, поражение брюшины, наличие асцита, низкая дифференцировка опухоли, наличие первичной опухоли, были выделены как независимые факторы неблагоприятного прогноза продолжительности жизни больных при анализе данных REGARD + RAINBOW [24]. В итальянском исследовании RAMoss ECOG ≥ 1 и наличие перитонеальной диссеминации также явились неблагоприятными прогностическими факторами [25].…”
Section: обсуждение полученных результатовunclassified