2022
DOI: 10.1007/s00493-021-4409-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ramsey Numbers of Books and Quasirandomness

Abstract: The book graph B (k) n consists of n copies of K k+1 joined along a common K k . The Ramsey numbers of B (k) n are known to have strong connections to the classical Ramsey numbers of cliques.Recently, the first author determined the asymptotic order of these Ramsey numbers for fixed k, thus answering an old question of Erdős, Faudree, Rousseau, and Schelp. In this paper, we first provide a simpler proof of this theorem. Next, answering a question of the first author, we present a different proof that avoids th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We remark that there is a strengthening of the regularity lemma, proved in [6], where each part is -regular with all but an -fraction of the other parts and each part is also -regular with itself. Working with this variant rather than Lemma 7 would allow us to simplify our proof very slightly.…”
Section: Definition 5 ( -Regular Pair) a Pair Of Vertex Subsetsmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…We remark that there is a strengthening of the regularity lemma, proved in [6], where each part is -regular with all but an -fraction of the other parts and each part is also -regular with itself. Working with this variant rather than Lemma 7 would allow us to simplify our proof very slightly.…”
Section: Definition 5 ( -Regular Pair) a Pair Of Vertex Subsetsmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…We will frequently use the following consequence, which can be used to count extensions of cliques and thus estimate the size of books, see [[8], Corollary 2.6].…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A refined version of the regularity lemma [Conlon [7], Lemma 3] guarantees that one can find a regular subset in each part of the partition for any graph. A key ingredient of the proof of our main result is the following refined regularity lemma [Conlon, Fox and Wigderson [8], Lemma 2.1], which is a slight strengthening of that due to Conlon [7] and the usual version of Szemerédi's regularity lemma [24]. An earlier refined version of the regularity lemma due to Alon, Fischer, Krivelevich and Szegedy [1] has been used in the proof of the induced removal lemma.…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations