2004
DOI: 10.1016/s0001-8708(03)00082-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ramification of valuations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
235
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

5
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(236 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(67 reference statements)
1
235
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The following result is [13] (7) and (8) are a rephrasing of the statement "gn = 1 for rt > > 0" in loc.cit. For 6 = 0, the inequality ni > 1 follows from the definitions in [13] and for 6 > 0, the inequality ni > p6 follows from ibid.…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The following result is [13] (7) and (8) are a rephrasing of the statement "gn = 1 for rt > > 0" in loc.cit. For 6 = 0, the inequality ni > 1 follows from the definitions in [13] and for 6 > 0, the inequality ni > p6 follows from ibid.…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…In the last few years, de Jong's foundational paper [17] triggered renewed interest in Jung's method; some of Abhyankar's conjectures have been studied and proved recently by Cutkosky [9] [10] (see also [11] and [13]). A valuative version of de Jong's theorem is proved in [22] using ramification theoretic methods (see also [20]).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The first author has shown with Olivier Piltant in [9] that a relative local uniformization theorem holds for the extension K * of K, which gives the strongest possible generalization of the classical ramification theory of Dedekind domains to general valuations. The following theorem is a summary of some of the conclusions of Theorem 6.3 [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%