2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.fusengdes.2012.11.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

RAMI analyses of the IFMIF accelerator facility and first availability allocation between systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
(4 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An iterative process was followed to match IFMIF design and availability studies [1,2]. These iterations made it possible to include recommendations and design change proposals coming from the RAMI analyses into the accelerator reference design.…”
Section: Ifmif Rami Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An iterative process was followed to match IFMIF design and availability studies [1,2]. These iterations made it possible to include recommendations and design change proposals coming from the RAMI analyses into the accelerator reference design.…”
Section: Ifmif Rami Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hardware availability requirement was fixed considering a beam degradation of only 2%, and then assuming that the mean intensity would be 98% of the nominal intensity [4]. As this degradation cannot be calculated with RiskSpectrum, an estimation was made based on the reliability results [5].…”
Section: Probabilistic Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RAMI analysis has been performed for some relevant systems of fusion reactors, such as RAMI analysis for ITER fuel cycle system [4], RAMI analysis for ITER Control Data Access and Communication (CODAC) functions [5] and RAMI analysis for DEMO HCPB blanket concept cooling system [6]. Bargallo E performed RAMI analyses for the IFMIF accelerator facility and first availability allocation between systems [7]. Maisonnier D summarized the RAMI analysis in ITER and DEMO and recommended adopting a reliability growth program for future fusion devices [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the first iteration [76], the methodology to be used for the analysis was presented. Initial assumptions were explained, and initial results were shown.…”
Section: Iterative Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the second iteration [77], a new availability calculation was proposed in order to allow a complete availability analysis, considering all factors that may contribute to unavailability. Beam trips were considered, and beam degradations calculations were proposed.…”
Section: Iterative Processmentioning
confidence: 99%