The Andrews Festschrift 2001
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-56513-7_3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ramanujan’s Unpublished Manuscript on the Partition and Tau Functions with Proofs and Commentary

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
94
0
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(104 citation statements)
references
References 83 publications
1
94
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In Section 3, we examine the role of Eisenstein series in proving congruences for the partition function p(n). This material is found in a manuscript of Ramanujan on the partition and tau functions first published in handwritten form in [44] and then in [12] with commentary. The results in these two sections bring us to the natural investigation of possible congruences for the coefficients of quotients of Eisenstein series upon which we briefly focus in Section 4.…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In Section 3, we examine the role of Eisenstein series in proving congruences for the partition function p(n). This material is found in a manuscript of Ramanujan on the partition and tau functions first published in handwritten form in [44] and then in [12] with commentary. The results in these two sections bring us to the natural investigation of possible congruences for the coefficients of quotients of Eisenstein series upon which we briefly focus in Section 4.…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…232-238]. A typed version of Ramanujan's unpublished manuscript, together with proofs and commentary, has been prepared by Berndt and K. Ono [12]. The latter paper and the new edition of Ramanujan's Collected Papers [42, pp.…”
Section: Eisenstein Series and Partitionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…135-177] and a comprehensive list of references to work of other authors has been given by B. C. Berndt and K. Ono [3]. Perhaps the simplest proof of (1.1), relying only on classical identities of Euler and Jacobi, is due to M. D. Hirschhorn and D. C. Hunt [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latter manuscript, concentrating on both p(n) and Ramanujan's τ -function τ (n), was published for the first time with Ramanujan's lost notebook [17] in its original handwritten form. Later, this p(n)/τ (n) manuscript was prepared for journal publication, with amplification of details and extensive commentary, by the first author and K. Ono [7]. That article is reproduced in the book [1] by Andrews and Berndt, with the previous commentary considerably expanded.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%