2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-75380-5_10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Raman Spectroscopy and Confocal Raman Imaging in Mineralogy and Petrography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This could mean that the sulfate was locally sampled and only represented a thin surface coating on a fragment of impact glass, and thus was reasonably a product of Antarctic weathering and not of indigenous lunar volatiles. On the other hand, it has been shown that Raman analysis can degrade or decompose sulfate minerals (Rosasco and Roedder 1979;Fries and Steele 2010) and thus, the original sulfate grain or coating could have been destroyed during the preliminary examination. Bulk composition data from: PCA 02007, Korotev et al (2006); ALHA81005, Palme et al (1983); Dhofar 026, Warren et al (2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This could mean that the sulfate was locally sampled and only represented a thin surface coating on a fragment of impact glass, and thus was reasonably a product of Antarctic weathering and not of indigenous lunar volatiles. On the other hand, it has been shown that Raman analysis can degrade or decompose sulfate minerals (Rosasco and Roedder 1979;Fries and Steele 2010) and thus, the original sulfate grain or coating could have been destroyed during the preliminary examination. Bulk composition data from: PCA 02007, Korotev et al (2006); ALHA81005, Palme et al (1983); Dhofar 026, Warren et al (2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To minimize any possible anisotropy effect on the intensity resulting from random crystallographic orientation of analyzed grains [28] and to avoid sample thickness effect, the analysis of each specimen was repeated 4 times on various grains. Interpretation of spectra was performed with the aid of OMNIC for Dispersive Raman software.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We show that the contaminant infrared feature at 1261 cm À1 is absent in all spectra of the studied samples. Thin section preparation may also contaminate the samples with artificial organic matter (Fries and Steele 2010), which result in stronger aliphatic CH bands near 3000-2800 cm À1 in the infrared spectra. However, the infrared spectra presented here do not have such strong aliphatic CH bands, and therefore organic contamination in our samples is less likely.…”
Section: Sample Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thin section preparation has been reported to potentially modify/disrupt carbonaceous phases, which may lead to modified Raman D and G carbon peak parameters (Pasteris 1989;Fries and Steele 2010). In an effort to eliminate this problem, we collected the Raman imaging data at 2.5 lm depth below the surface in all samples.…”
Section: Raman Microspectroscopic Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%