2022
DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.1c04990
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Raman Optical Activity of 1T-TaS2

Abstract: Measurements of optical activity can be readily performed in transparent matter by means of a rotation of transmitted light polarization. In the case of opaque bulk materials, such measurements cannot be performed, making it difficult to assess possible chiral properties. In this work, we present full angular polarization dependencies of the Raman modes of bulk 1T-TaS 2 , which has recently been suggested to have chiral properties after pulsed laser excitation. We found that a mechanical… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The out-of-plane A 1g Raman modes for the σ+σ+ and σ−σ− configurations are almost the same, whereas the intensities of in-plane E g modes differ remarkably for the σ+σ− and σ−σ+ configurations, indicating that the chiral Raman response may correspond to an in-plane chiral structure. Similar experimental results of chiral Raman response in 1T-TaS 2 have been reported recently, which were well explained by Raman tensor analysis, either by introducing an antisymmetric Raman tensor or including complex Raman tensor elements 28 , 29 .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The out-of-plane A 1g Raman modes for the σ+σ+ and σ−σ− configurations are almost the same, whereas the intensities of in-plane E g modes differ remarkably for the σ+σ− and σ−σ+ configurations, indicating that the chiral Raman response may correspond to an in-plane chiral structure. Similar experimental results of chiral Raman response in 1T-TaS 2 have been reported recently, which were well explained by Raman tensor analysis, either by introducing an antisymmetric Raman tensor or including complex Raman tensor elements 28 , 29 .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Two linear polarizers were set parallel to each otherone in the incoming laser excitation path and the other in the spectrometer detection pathand a half-wave plate was mounted directly in front of the latter polarizer. Rotating the half-wave plate by θ/2 allowed for the detection of Raman scattered light that was effectively rotated by θ with respect to the polarization vector of the incident laser light . For the space group P 6 3 / mmc and specific Wyckoff positions occupied in the Fe 0.23 NbSe 2 crystal structure, the symmetry-adapted phonon modes (SAMs) expected at the zone-center Γ SL point are: Γ acoustic = A 2u + E 1u and Γ optical = 4A 1g + A 1u + 2A 2g + 5A 2u + 5B 1g + 2B 1u + B 2g + 5B 2u + 5E 1g + 7E 1u + 7E 2g + 6E 2u . Based on the optical phonons present, the expected Raman-active modes are 4A 1g + 5E 1g + 7E 2g . As in the unpolarized Raman experiment, the backscattering measurement geometry along the ZZ direction precludes the detection of the E 1g modes for materials with this space group symmetry …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In bulk 1T-TaS 2 , (purple spectrum), the intense peaks in the range of 70 to 130 cm −1 , as well as the low-intensity peaks in the range of 225 to 400 cm −1 range, are attributed to the zone-folded acoustic and optical phonons. [50][51][52][53] These phonon branches appear because of Brillouin zone reconstruction in the C-CDW phase and disappear during the C-CDW-NC-CDW phase transition. [51] At 93 K, the bulk crystal and the fillers are all in the C-CDW phase.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Raman spectroscopy is a standard technique for monitoring CDW phase transition owing to its sensitivity to the crystal lattice distortions, reconstruction and phonon folding due to CDW periodicity, and the loss of translation symmetry in the IC-CDW phase. [49][50][51][52][53] The Raman spectra were accumulated in the conventional backscattering configuration at T ≈ 93 K. The Raman laser spot size was ≈1 µm. Experiments were conducted with the minimum laser power to avoid any laser-induced heating effects.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%