2011
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.107.063904
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Raman Lasing with a Cold Atom Gain Medium in a High-Finesse Optical Cavity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
35
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These represent improvements by more than an order of magnitude in atom number for singleatom resolution [12][13][14][15][16][17][18], and by ∼ 10 dB in measurement variance (relative to the SQL) over the best previous detection [11]. While spatially varying coupling of atoms to the probe light standing wave prevents direct observation of a quantized atom number signal, we demonstrate the ability to measure differences of one atom in our system and hence to perform the parity measurement that would detect a GHZ state in a uniformly coupled system [33]. When combined with entangled-state preparation by unitary cavity squeezing as proposed in [23,34] We probe the atoms with near-resonant light of wavelength 2π/k = 780 nm inside a standing-wave optical cavity, while the atoms are trapped in a far-detuned intracavity standing wave of wavelength 2π/k t = 852 nm.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These represent improvements by more than an order of magnitude in atom number for singleatom resolution [12][13][14][15][16][17][18], and by ∼ 10 dB in measurement variance (relative to the SQL) over the best previous detection [11]. While spatially varying coupling of atoms to the probe light standing wave prevents direct observation of a quantized atom number signal, we demonstrate the ability to measure differences of one atom in our system and hence to perform the parity measurement that would detect a GHZ state in a uniformly coupled system [33]. When combined with entangled-state preparation by unitary cavity squeezing as proposed in [23,34] We probe the atoms with near-resonant light of wavelength 2π/k = 780 nm inside a standing-wave optical cavity, while the atoms are trapped in a far-detuned intracavity standing wave of wavelength 2π/k t = 852 nm.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The demonstrated sensitivity enables the parity measurement that characterizes a GHZ state, with parity fringe visibility of about 30% for 20-30 atoms and 50% for a few atoms. Uniform atomcavity coupling, required to observe a quantized atomic signal in the cavity system, can be achieved by using a trap wavelength that equals twice the probe wavelength [33]. The generation of GHZ states via atom-cavity interaction [24,34] will require strong atom-cavity coupling η > 1 to avoid decoherence by free-space scattering, and the readout resolution is likely to further improve in such a system.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the opposite regime to our work, a laser-cooled 87 Rb Raman laser was recently demonstrated to operate deep in the good-cavity regime in Ref. [19].…”
Section: Laser Regime Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Most optical lasers operate in the good-cavity limit (one example is the cold atom Raman laser of Ref. [19]), with microcavity diode lasers [20] and far infrared (FIR) gas lasers, using Xe [21], NH 3 [22,23], and HeXe/HeNe [12], operating in the vicinity of the crossover, polariton-like regime. Our cold atom Raman laser is unique both in terms of operating so deeply into the bad-cavity regime, and also in that the steady-state intracavity photon number can be made much less than one.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This gain mechanism has been used in different beautiful experiments on lasing with cold atoms in different regimes [105][106][107] and our experiment on random lasing also uses this gain (see sections 3.3.4 and 3.4).…”
Section: Raman Gain Using Zeeman Sublevelsmentioning
confidence: 99%