2020
DOI: 10.1103/physrevmaterials.4.014001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Raman and IR spectra of graphdiyne nanoribbons

Abstract: γ-graphdiyne is a 2D carbon structure beyond graphene: it is formed by sp and sp 2 carbon atoms organized as hexagonal rings connected by linear links, and it is predicted to be a semiconductor. The lateral confinement of γ-graphdiyne nanoribbons significantly affects the electronic and vibrational properties. By means of periodic Density Functional Theory (DFT) calculations we here investigate the electronic band structure, the Raman and IR spectra of γ-graphdiyne 2D crystal and related nanoribbons. We discus… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

8
40
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
8
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As also demonstrated in our previous work on y-GDY (6-hT 2 ), this functional can indeed give a more accurate quantitative evaluation of the band gap, in agreement with benchmark GW-computed values, even if the qualitative trends are the same obtained with PBE0. 31 The comparison between the band structure/DOS computed with these two functionals is reported in the Supporting Information (Table S1). As expected, HSE06 band gap values are lower: 1.11 versus 1.63 eV for 6-hT 2 (y-GDY), 0.34 versus 0.83 eV for 6-hT 2 R, and 0.68 versus 1.14 eV for 6-HT 2 (β-GDY); however, they still confirm that these structures are finite-band gap semiconductor.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…As also demonstrated in our previous work on y-GDY (6-hT 2 ), this functional can indeed give a more accurate quantitative evaluation of the band gap, in agreement with benchmark GW-computed values, even if the qualitative trends are the same obtained with PBE0. 31 The comparison between the band structure/DOS computed with these two functionals is reported in the Supporting Information (Table S1). As expected, HSE06 band gap values are lower: 1.11 versus 1.63 eV for 6-hT 2 (y-GDY), 0.34 versus 0.83 eV for 6-hT 2 R, and 0.68 versus 1.14 eV for 6-HT 2 (β-GDY); however, they still confirm that these structures are finite-band gap semiconductor.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 52 This level of theory has been chosen according to our previous investigations of the structural and vibrational properties of γ-GDY and related nanoribbons, where the results obtained using different functionals and basis sets have been compared. 31 When using the 6-31G(d) basis set in PBC-DFT simulations with the CRYSTAL code, the exponent of the diffuse sp orbitals of carbon atoms has been increased from 0.1687144 to 0.187 bohr –2 to avoid convergence problems in the SCF, due to basis set linear dependencies. 53 Considering the other simulation parameters, the tolerance on integral screening has been fixed to 9,9,9,9,80 (TOLINTEG parameters), while the shrink parameters defining Monkhorst–Pack and Gilat sampling points have been fixed to 100 and 200 for the calculation of the band structure and DOS, respectively.…”
Section: Theoretical Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The characteristic Raman signal of sp carbon and its structure-related behavior allows a detailed investigation of sp and sp-sp 2 carbon systems. 18 , 19 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%