2017
DOI: 10.1039/c7an00592j
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Raman and infrared spectroscopy differentiate senescent from proliferating cells in a human dermal fibroblast 3D skin model

Abstract: Senescent cells contribute to tissue aging and dysfunction. Therefore, detecting senescent cells in skin is of interest for skin tumor diagnostics and therapy. Here, we studied the transition into senescence of human dermal fibroblasts (HDFs) in a three-dimensional (3D) human fibroblast-derived matrix (FDM). Senescent and proliferating cells were imaged by Raman spectroscopy (RS) and Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy. The obtained averaged spectra were analyzed using PLS-LDA. For these 3D cultured… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
24
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
5
24
1
Order By: Relevance
“…3b, c), among others, amide II (1480-1580 cm −1 ) and amide III (1220-1300 cm −1 ) bands corresponding to proteins, lipids, and nucleic acids, as well as peaks between 600 and 900 cm −1 referring to nucleic acids, are responsible for the differences in the analyzed spectra. These findings are consistent with differences in Raman fingerprints at the cellular level between proliferating and senescent fibroblasts 15,16 . As additional control, we analyzed the supernatants of skin equivalents with low young fibroblast cell numbers, again to exclude that lower fibroblast density might confound the results.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…3b, c), among others, amide II (1480-1580 cm −1 ) and amide III (1220-1300 cm −1 ) bands corresponding to proteins, lipids, and nucleic acids, as well as peaks between 600 and 900 cm −1 referring to nucleic acids, are responsible for the differences in the analyzed spectra. These findings are consistent with differences in Raman fingerprints at the cellular level between proliferating and senescent fibroblasts 15,16 . As additional control, we analyzed the supernatants of skin equivalents with low young fibroblast cell numbers, again to exclude that lower fibroblast density might confound the results.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Indeed, first proof of principle for Raman- and near-infrared spectroscopy, followed by multivariate statistics has been achieved as it was able to distinguish different cell types and cellular states in a non-invasive manner. First results on different human fibroblast strains, which were cultivated in 2D and 3D and subjected to serial passaging to induce replicative senescence, are very promising and allowed classification of cells at high confidence ( 26 , 27 ). However, it needs to be determined if these methods are also applicable to other cell types, as well as to other inducers of cellular senescence.…”
Section: Mechanisms Of Cellular Senescence Induction and Their Connecmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Raman spectroscopy has likewise been investigated for its ability in distinguishing between young and senescent cells. This was demonstrated in breast cancer cells [121], human umbilical cord MSCs [122] and in human dermal fibroblasts [123,124]. In Raman spectroscopy, the Raman peaks provide biochemical and compositional information of the probed cells.…”
Section: Raman Scatteringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, changes in Raman peaks are typically too subtle for easy identification. In that regard, of note is the incorporation of machine learning methods in the more recent publications [123,124] that largely facilitate the data analysis process.…”
Section: Raman Scatteringmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation