The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2017
DOI: 10.1109/tcsi.2017.2649572
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rakeness-Based Design of Low-Complexity Compressed Sensing

Abstract: Compressed Sensing (CS) can be introduced in the processing chain of a sensor node as a mean to globally reduce its operating cost, while maximizing the quality of the acquired signal. We exploit CS as a simple early-digital compression stage that performs a multiplication of the signal by a matrix. The operating costs (e.g., the consumed power) of such an encoding stage depend on the number of rows of the matrix, but also on the value and position of the rows' coefficients. Our novel design flow yields optimi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is the main reason why we may expect higher performance with rakeness-based CS with respect to other signal agnostic techniques, at least when localization is strong enough. For the ECG signals, in [21] it is also proved that rakeness-based CS outperforms the approch discussed in [27] which, similar to our, is suitable for binary sensing matrices. Others techniques (like [25], [26]) have a further limitation, both approaches are not compatible with the antipodal symbol constraints, thus requiring full multipliers at the encoder side.…”
Section: Basics Of Compressed Sensingsupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is the main reason why we may expect higher performance with rakeness-based CS with respect to other signal agnostic techniques, at least when localization is strong enough. For the ECG signals, in [21] it is also proved that rakeness-based CS outperforms the approch discussed in [27] which, similar to our, is suitable for binary sensing matrices. Others techniques (like [25], [26]) have a further limitation, both approaches are not compatible with the antipodal symbol constraints, thus requiring full multipliers at the encoder side.…”
Section: Basics Of Compressed Sensingsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Note that the adoption of a decoder properly specialized on the ECG reconstruction does not imply that the rakeness-based CS is useless. As proved in [21] for BSBL and WLM, using an adapted sensing matrix following the rakeness design-flow further increases the performance of a properly specialized decoding stage. Among the mentioned approach, we focus here on WLM.…”
Section: Adapted Decoder For Ecgmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In standard CS theory, this is ensured by generating entries of A as instances of independent and identically distributed random variables [6]. Along all possible CS encoders already proposed in the literature, circuit implementations that adopt either antipodal or ternary random sensing matrices are more advantageous [8], [11]- [13]. This means that the sensing matrix entries are still random but are limited to either A j,k ∈ {−1, 1} or A j,k ∈ {−1, 0, 1} where, in the latter case, an increase in the number of zeros implies a reduction in the number of operations needed to compute y.…”
Section: Compressed Sensingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where p i (•) and n i (•) map the positions of positive and negative entries of the i-th row of A, respectively. The CS approach was expanded in [8], [14] where the authors proposed a soft adaptation of the second-order statistics of the sensing matrix rows to the second-order statistics of the acquired class of signals, and this method is called rakeness-based CS.…”
Section: Compressed Sensingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation