2009
DOI: 10.4324/9780203864883
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Raising the Achievement of All Pupils Within an Inclusive Setting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We try to avoid the word "gifted"-or the G-word-especially when it is used as an entity (noun or object e.g., "he or she is gifted"), preferring to talk and write about students with higher learning potential and using the G-word as an adjective (e.g., he or she is a gifted [superior, advanced, innovative, exceptional, persuasive, compelling] writer for his or her age or compared with others her age; see also Renzulli, 2012). Although students with higher learning potential might include "gifted" students, underachieving able students, or students with dual or multiple exceptionalities (Wallace et al, 2009), they are not the focus in this study. The term students with higher learning potential constitutes a complex group of individuals with different needs comprising students who achieve at high levels and those who have potential to do so, a group estimated to constitute 10% to 15% of the school population (Gagné, 2005;Idsøe, 2014;Renzulli, 2005;Theilgaard & Raaschou, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We try to avoid the word "gifted"-or the G-word-especially when it is used as an entity (noun or object e.g., "he or she is gifted"), preferring to talk and write about students with higher learning potential and using the G-word as an adjective (e.g., he or she is a gifted [superior, advanced, innovative, exceptional, persuasive, compelling] writer for his or her age or compared with others her age; see also Renzulli, 2012). Although students with higher learning potential might include "gifted" students, underachieving able students, or students with dual or multiple exceptionalities (Wallace et al, 2009), they are not the focus in this study. The term students with higher learning potential constitutes a complex group of individuals with different needs comprising students who achieve at high levels and those who have potential to do so, a group estimated to constitute 10% to 15% of the school population (Gagné, 2005;Idsøe, 2014;Renzulli, 2005;Theilgaard & Raaschou, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inclusion of this advice is consistent with all teachers' obligation, embodied in the APST, to "differentiate teaching to meet the specific learning needs of students across the full range of abilities" (AITSL, 2011, standard 1.5). It is also consistent with a large body of Australian and international research indicating that, in most educational settings, gifted and talented students benefit from learning experiences that enable them to access more advanced content, work through material at a faster pace, and systematically develop their academic interests through individually-tailored experiences (Gross, Urquhart, Doyle, Juratowitch & Matheson, 2011;Ministry of Education, 2012;Rogers, 2007;Tomlinson, 1997, Wallace, 2007.…”
Section: Educating Gifted Studentsmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Several authors have highlighted the leader's role in promoting change in educational settings (Thornton et al , 2007), and while diversity within the school has been a significant force from the 1990s some managers, considering its value and promoting inclusion have used this change to influence their school's organisational culture (Miller, 1998). Inclusion is a continuous development where all children should learn alongside peers, and how to approach all students and particularly those with special needs must be included in all aspects of school life (Wallace et al , 2010). During this period many policies and practices encouraged inclusion, but few papers actually illustrate how head teachers could facilitate this process.…”
Section: Strategic Leadership and Inclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%