2016
DOI: 10.1090/ert/490
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Raising nilpotent orbits in wave-front sets

Abstract: Abstract. We study wave-front sets of representations of reductive groups over global or non-archimedean local fields.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

3
45
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
3
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By [26,Section I.6], nilpotent orbits corresponding to the partition [(2n+1)(2n−1)1 3 ] are parametrized by certain quadratic forms {β 2n+1 , β 2n−1 , q V 0 }, corresponding to the parts (2n+1), (2n−1) and 1 3 , where β 2n+1 and β 2n−1 are square classes, and q V 0 is the quadratic form in 3 variables on V 0 (see Section 2.1). This parametrization can be refined according to [13,Proposition 8.1], that is, E τ ⊗σ actually has a non-zero generalized Whittaker-Fourier coefficient attached to the nilpotent O, corresponding to the partition [(2n + 1)(2n − 1)1 3 ] and parametrized by quadratic forms {β, −β, q V 0 } for some β ∈ F × . Note that the normalization of the bilinear form for the irreducible representation of sl 2 (C) of dimension i in [13] differs from the one in [26] by the factor (−1) [(i−1)/2] (See [13,Section 7]).…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…By [26,Section I.6], nilpotent orbits corresponding to the partition [(2n+1)(2n−1)1 3 ] are parametrized by certain quadratic forms {β 2n+1 , β 2n−1 , q V 0 }, corresponding to the parts (2n+1), (2n−1) and 1 3 , where β 2n+1 and β 2n−1 are square classes, and q V 0 is the quadratic form in 3 variables on V 0 (see Section 2.1). This parametrization can be refined according to [13,Proposition 8.1], that is, E τ ⊗σ actually has a non-zero generalized Whittaker-Fourier coefficient attached to the nilpotent O, corresponding to the partition [(2n + 1)(2n − 1)1 3 ] and parametrized by quadratic forms {β, −β, q V 0 } for some β ∈ F × . Note that the normalization of the bilinear form for the irreducible representation of sl 2 (C) of dimension i in [13] differs from the one in [26] by the factor (−1) [(i−1)/2] (See [13,Section 7]).…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This parametrization can be refined according to [13,Proposition 8.1], that is, E τ ⊗σ actually has a non-zero generalized Whittaker-Fourier coefficient attached to the nilpotent O, corresponding to the partition [(2n + 1)(2n − 1)1 3 ] and parametrized by quadratic forms {β, −β, q V 0 } for some β ∈ F × . Note that the normalization of the bilinear form for the irreducible representation of sl 2 (C) of dimension i in [13] differs from the one in [26] by the factor (−1) [(i−1)/2] (See [13,Section 7]). In the following, we show that such a β will suffice for the theorem.…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The main goal of the present paper is to use the techniques of [JL13,JLS16,GGS17], in particular the notion of Whittaker pair, to extend the above results to all of SL n .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%