2013
DOI: 10.1080/02680939.2012.715355
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Raising and doubling ‘standards' in professional discourse: a critical bid

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The phenomenon can be described as an outsidein vs. an inside-out professionalism (cf. Stanley & Stonach, 2013). It is argued that the way in which people from the outside have assumed the right to define what is good and bad education has created a systematic disbelief in teachers in ways that have reduced their professional autonomy (Ball, 2011;Beach & Bagley, 2012;Krantz, 2009;Lauder, Brown, & Halsey, 2009).…”
Section: Examples Of Media Images Of Teachers and Educational Researcmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The phenomenon can be described as an outsidein vs. an inside-out professionalism (cf. Stanley & Stonach, 2013). It is argued that the way in which people from the outside have assumed the right to define what is good and bad education has created a systematic disbelief in teachers in ways that have reduced their professional autonomy (Ball, 2011;Beach & Bagley, 2012;Krantz, 2009;Lauder, Brown, & Halsey, 2009).…”
Section: Examples Of Media Images Of Teachers and Educational Researcmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In fact, an increasing body of both qualitative and quantitative literature details the injurious consequences of standards-based reforms -or what Berliner and Glass (2014) and others (e.g., Sahlberg 2011) refer to as the Global Education Reform Movement -on educators' professional identities, knowledge and practice (see also Berliner 2011). In addition to these professional effects, researchers in the field of English education are now showing that this has adverse flow-on effects for student learning (see Gannon 2012;Stanley and Stronach 2013;Turvey, Yandell, and Ali 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Particular concerns are being expressed about the dampening effect this is having on creativity in English teachers' professional practice (Turvey et al 2012;Meyer and Benavot 2013;Stanley and Stronach 2013;Doecke, Parr, and Sawyer 2014) and on their professional learning practices in particular (Groundwater-Smith and Mockler 2009;Parr 2010;Doecke 2013). Notwithstanding mounting evidence of the damaging consequences of standards-based reforms, and in spite of the large body of research showing the value of increasing diversification in education practices, there continues to be large-scale national and local investment in standardizing practices and discourses in the schooling sector as well as in the tertiary sector (see Ozga 2009;Casinader et al 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The second, which is labeled as inside-outprofessionalism, is instead characterized by a teaching practice that is complex and changeable, depending on the qualified judgment of the teacher. It is not a question of defining the two forms of professionalism, but rather discussing where the limits of teachers' responsibilities are to be drawn (Stanley & Stronach, 2013). Central to inside-outprofessionalism is teacher judgment (e.g.…”
Section: The Teaching Profession and Professionalismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The three sub-themes are also related to an inside-out-professionality, in that they correspond to a notion of teaching as a more or less standardized (Stanley & Stronach 2013) approach, i.e. by fulfilling outside demands such as policy documents, or more or less pre-defined methods of teaching.…”
Section: In Order To Be Democratic In Education We Need To Follow a Cmentioning
confidence: 99%