2021
DOI: 10.5194/amt-14-3169-2021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

RainForest: a random forest algorithm for quantitative precipitation estimation over Switzerland

Abstract: Abstract. Quantitative precipitation estimation (QPE) is a difficult task, particularly in complex topography, and requires the adjustment of empirical relations between radar observables and precipitation quantities, as well as methods to transform observations aloft to estimations at the ground level. In this work, we tackle this classical problem with a new twist, by training a random forest (RF) regression to learn a QPE model directly from a large database comprising 4 years of combined gauge and polarime… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
(59 reference statements)
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When comparing the RF result to corrected reflectivity images, specifically the case studies, the approach is able to reproduce the spatial variability of rainfall in more detail and precision, although its quantitative performance is lower than its counterpart because of underestimation/overestimation of stronger rainfall. Limitations on the RF calibration scheme can be attributed to the reduced number of samples used for training the model in comparison with previous studies [30,31]. Particularly high precipitation records are scarce, and thus, the RF approach lacks enough training samples for generalization.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…When comparing the RF result to corrected reflectivity images, specifically the case studies, the approach is able to reproduce the spatial variability of rainfall in more detail and precision, although its quantitative performance is lower than its counterpart because of underestimation/overestimation of stronger rainfall. Limitations on the RF calibration scheme can be attributed to the reduced number of samples used for training the model in comparison with previous studies [30,31]. Particularly high precipitation records are scarce, and thus, the RF approach lacks enough training samples for generalization.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the derivation of radar QPE by using the random forest algorithm has recently proven to have high potential and promising results [30][31][32], and its application has increasingly been reported in the literature [33][34][35]. This technique has many advantages in comparison with other machine learning methods and has successfully improved the performance of radar QPE data in mountain regions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Other researchers have already assessed RF in rainfall with promising results [40][41][42]. For further details, the following work can be revised [42].…”
Section: Random Forest (Rf)mentioning
confidence: 99%