2011
DOI: 10.1080/13241583.2011.11465379
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rainfall-Runoff Modelling Across Southeast Australia: Datasets, Models and Results

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
68
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
4
68
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Quality controlled daily streamflow records for 416 unregulated catchments were obtained from the datasets of Vaze et al (2011) (231 of 232 for south-eastern Australia), and Zhang et al (2011) (185 of 719 Australia-wide). Streamflow records for these catchments were intermittent during the period 1950-2010.…”
Section: Streamflow Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quality controlled daily streamflow records for 416 unregulated catchments were obtained from the datasets of Vaze et al (2011) (231 of 232 for south-eastern Australia), and Zhang et al (2011) (185 of 719 Australia-wide). Streamflow records for these catchments were intermittent during the period 1950-2010.…”
Section: Streamflow Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The median NSE obtained from this study is approximately 0.50 higher than that in Zhang et al (2016), which used 0.5° resolution Princeton global forcing data and is approximately 0.90 higher than that obtained from the ensemble mean of eight global hydrological models in Beck et al (2016b), which used 0.5° resolution WATCH global forcing data ERA-interim (WFDEI) meteorological data. However, the median NSE obtained from this study 20 is similar to or marginally different from that obtained in the regionalisation studies conducted in southeastern Australia (Vaze et al, 2011;Viney et al, 2009a), which all used the same SILO forcing data. Therefore, the key for improving the prediction of runoff at regional and continental scales is the quality of the forcing data.…”
Section: Quality Forcing Data Are the Key For Macro-scale Runoff Predmentioning
confidence: 45%
“…1, Table 1). Australian streamflow data are taken from the Catchment Water Yield Estimation Tool (CWYET) data set (Vaze et al, 2011). Australian rainfall and potential evaporation data are derived from the Australian Water Availability Project (AWAP) data set (Jones et al, 2009).…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%