2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosres.2011.02.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rainfall events prediction using rule-based fuzzy inference system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0
4

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
23
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The ML models utilize, assimilate and 'learn' from the evidence of past climate trends using observational dataset to predict the future. Many types of ML algorithms have recently been proposed in literature, including the co-integration methods that analyze relationships between stationary and nonstationary data (Kaufmann et al, 2011;Kaufmann and Stern, 2002), regression approaches for evaluating timeseries properties of air temperature (Douglass et al, 2004;Stone and Allen, 2005), neural networks for predicting rainfall Marohasy, 2012, 2014), wavelet or vector-regression for hydro-meteorological forecasting (Belayneh and Adamowski, 2012) and rainfall events prediction using rule-based fuzzy inference systems (Asklany et al, 2011). The practical advantages of the ML algorithm over the GCM are the explanation of the externally driven climate without the need for complex physical models, easiness of experimentation, validation and evaluation, low computational burden, much more simple and fast in the training and the testing phases, the applicability to the data for a specific point of measurement (a specific area, for example) and the competitive performance compared to physical models (Ortiz-García et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ML models utilize, assimilate and 'learn' from the evidence of past climate trends using observational dataset to predict the future. Many types of ML algorithms have recently been proposed in literature, including the co-integration methods that analyze relationships between stationary and nonstationary data (Kaufmann et al, 2011;Kaufmann and Stern, 2002), regression approaches for evaluating timeseries properties of air temperature (Douglass et al, 2004;Stone and Allen, 2005), neural networks for predicting rainfall Marohasy, 2012, 2014), wavelet or vector-regression for hydro-meteorological forecasting (Belayneh and Adamowski, 2012) and rainfall events prediction using rule-based fuzzy inference systems (Asklany et al, 2011). The practical advantages of the ML algorithm over the GCM are the explanation of the externally driven climate without the need for complex physical models, easiness of experimentation, validation and evaluation, low computational burden, much more simple and fast in the training and the testing phases, the applicability to the data for a specific point of measurement (a specific area, for example) and the competitive performance compared to physical models (Ortiz-García et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Beberapa peneliti menggunakan metode Logika Fuzzy untuk menghadapi berbagai kondisi yang tidak pasti/jelas (Asklany et al, 2011;FallahGhalhary et al, 2009;Hasan et al, 2013) sedangkan beberapa peneliti yang lain menggunakan metode Jaringan Syaraf Tiruan multi-layer untuk menghadapi kondisi dengan ketidakpastian yang terus meningkat (Awan and Maqbool, 2010;Khidir et al, 2013;Mislan et al, 2015).…”
Section: Tinjauan Pustakaunclassified
“…In general, there are two kinds of fuzzy inference systems that can be implemented, namely the Mamdani Type and the Sugeno Type. According to [8]; [9], there are four phases to obtain output in the type of Mamdani Fuzzy Inference System, namely: 1. Comparing the input variables with membership functions in the antecedent ("because" part) to obtain the membership value of each linguistic variables.…”
Section: Fuzzy Logicmentioning
confidence: 99%