2013
DOI: 10.5194/hess-17-4701-2013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rainfall estimation using moving cars as rain gauges – laboratory experiments

Abstract: Abstract. The spatial assessment of short time-step precipitation is a challenging task. Low density of observation networks, as well as the bias in radar rainfall estimation motivated the new idea of exploiting cars as moving rain gauges with windshield wipers or optical sensors as measurement devices. In a preliminary study, this idea has been tested with computer experiments (Haberlandt and Sester, 2010). The results have shown that a high number of possibly inaccurate measurement devices (moving cars) prov… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
54
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
54
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Rabiei et al (2013) proposed to use a linear relationship for taking the effect of the car speed for RainCars into consideration. A similar approach could be applied for compensating the effect of wind speed, knowing the wind direction.…”
Section: Traffic Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Rabiei et al (2013) proposed to use a linear relationship for taking the effect of the car speed for RainCars into consideration. A similar approach could be applied for compensating the effect of wind speed, knowing the wind direction.…”
Section: Traffic Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results are compared with what occurs in practice, i.e., using only the rain gauge network. The uncertainties for the rainfall measurement by RCs are taken from the results of the laboratory experiments (Rabiei et al, 2013). For a more general conclusion, larger uncertainties are also investigated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations