2016
DOI: 10.1002/2016jd025382
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rainfall estimation by inverting SMOS soil moisture estimates: A comparison of different methods over Australia

Abstract: Remote sensing of soil moisture has reached a level of maturity and accuracy for which the retrieved products can be used to improve hydrological and meteorological applications. In this study, the soil moisture product from the Soil Moisture and Ocean Salinity (SMOS) satellite is used for improving satellite rainfall estimates obtained from the Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission multisatellite precipitation analysis product (TMPA) using three different “bottom up” techniques: SM2RAIN, Soil Moisture Analysis … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
58
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
2
58
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…SM2RAIN has also the main limitation of not being able to estimate rainfall if the soil is close to saturation, since no SM variations can be observed after rainfall events in such conditions. The algorithm has proved to accurately estimate rainfall both on a regional (Abera et al, 2016;Brocca et al, , 2015Brocca et al, , 2016Ciabatta et al, 2015Ciabatta et al, , 2017 and on a global scale (Brocca et al, 2014;Koster et al, 2016). For further details about the SM2RAIN formulation, the reader is referred to Brocca et al ( , 2014.…”
Section: Sm2rain Algorithm and Sm2rain-cci Rainfall Product Generationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SM2RAIN has also the main limitation of not being able to estimate rainfall if the soil is close to saturation, since no SM variations can be observed after rainfall events in such conditions. The algorithm has proved to accurately estimate rainfall both on a regional (Abera et al, 2016;Brocca et al, , 2015Brocca et al, , 2016Ciabatta et al, 2015Ciabatta et al, , 2017 and on a global scale (Brocca et al, 2014;Koster et al, 2016). For further details about the SM2RAIN formulation, the reader is referred to Brocca et al ( , 2014.…”
Section: Sm2rain Algorithm and Sm2rain-cci Rainfall Product Generationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, the number of publications on this topic is remarkably increasing likely due to the work by Brocca et al [137,138] who developed a "bottom-up" approach, called SM2RAIN, for directly estimating precipitation rates from soil moisture observations only. The method has been applied on a local scale with in situ observations [137,139] and on a regional/global scale with satellite data [138,140,141]. Moreover, the "bottom-up" approach was integrated with state-of-the-art rainfall products (i.e., "top-down" approach) for obtaining a superior rainfall product by Brocca et al [141] and Ciabatta et al [142] in Australia and Italy.…”
Section: Emerging Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method has been applied on a local scale with in situ observations [137,139] and on a regional/global scale with satellite data [138,140,141]. Moreover, the "bottom-up" approach was integrated with state-of-the-art rainfall products (i.e., "top-down" approach) for obtaining a superior rainfall product by Brocca et al [141] and Ciabatta et al [142] in Australia and Italy. Finally, the precipitation product corrected through soil moisture data were used in several recent studies for improving flood prediction [98,143,144].…”
Section: Emerging Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…J. Rodríguez-Fernández et al: SMOS near-real-time soil moisture product: processor overview itations, affects the partitioning of the water cycle (infiltration and run-off, and therefore the groundwater storage; see McColl et al, 2017) and it can also be used to improve rainfall estimations (Pellarin et al, 2008;Crow et al, 2009;Brocca et al, 2016). SM measurements have been used to perform data assimilation into land surface models (Xu et al, 2015;Blankenship et al, 2016;, SVAT (Soil Vegetation Atmosphere Transfer) models Ridler et al, 2014;Muñoz Sabater et al, 2007) and in carbon-cycle models (Scholze et al, 2016).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%