1965
DOI: 10.1109/tap.1965.1138472
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rainfall attenuation of centimeter waves: Comparison of theory and measurement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
46
0

Year Published

1969
1969
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 176 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…7) show much greater scatter and are more typical of the results reported in Medhurst's (1965) review.…”
Section: Ground To Groundsupporting
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…7) show much greater scatter and are more typical of the results reported in Medhurst's (1965) review.…”
Section: Ground To Groundsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…In an early study comparing theory and measurement Medhurst (1965) reported disappointing results. He found very wide scatter and a clear tendency for measured attenuations to exceed maximum theoretical values (i.e.. those corresponding to monodisperse drop sizes having the maximum extinction cross-section).…”
Section: Ground To Groundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results reported by Gunn and East (1954), Wexler and Atlas (1963) and Medhurst (1965) suggest that the attenuation of millimeter waves is too serious to be ignored in the observation of the precipitation in the case that the precipitation rate is greater than a few mm/hr. On the contrary, if the precipitation is weak as in the stratiform precipitations, the attenuation of X-and C-band rader waves by the precipitation particles is insignificant.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…(27) and (28). Since a steady signal and constant noise power are assumed, all the vi<s and at's in these equations are equal; hence for M pulses integrated the results are vM= M t (30) and…”
Section: I=l1mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is the half-width of the absorption line at the half-maximum point. 30,000 to 80,000 foot region. The increase at 10,000 feet is about 3 percent, and of course there is no change at zero altitude where the absorption is greatest.…”
Section: Propagation-medium Losses Tropospheric Absorptionmentioning
confidence: 99%