2018
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.1402959
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Raincloudplots Tutorials And Codebase

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There was extreme evidence that go/no-go training had an explicit devaluation effect on the selected foods when both baselines were examined (i.e., go and untrained foods). Liking ratings pre- and post-training have been visualised using a raincloud plot ( Allen et al, 2018 , 2019 ) and together with changes in liking ratings (ΔLiking) across training conditions they can be seen in Figure 2A . As predicted in H1a, the change in liking ratings, from pre-to post- training was negative for no-go foods (ΔLiking NOGO ; M = –18.9, SD = 21.9) and greater compared to the change for go foods (ΔLiking GO ; M = –11.3, SD = 18.3).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There was extreme evidence that go/no-go training had an explicit devaluation effect on the selected foods when both baselines were examined (i.e., go and untrained foods). Liking ratings pre- and post-training have been visualised using a raincloud plot ( Allen et al, 2018 , 2019 ) and together with changes in liking ratings (ΔLiking) across training conditions they can be seen in Figure 2A . As predicted in H1a, the change in liking ratings, from pre-to post- training was negative for no-go foods (ΔLiking NOGO ; M = –18.9, SD = 21.9) and greater compared to the change for go foods (ΔLiking GO ; M = –11.3, SD = 18.3).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Effect sizes of regression models were calculated using Cohen's F 2 using the following formula: [R 2 / (1 À R 2 )]. Behavioral data were visualized using RainCloudPlots for MATLAB (Allen et al, 2018(Allen et al, , 2019. The EEG signals were visualized using gramm for MATLAB (Morel, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There was extreme evidence that go/no-go training had an explicit devaluation effect on the selected foods when both baselines were examined (i.e., go and untrained foods). Liking ratings pre-and post-training have been visualised using a raincloud plot (Allen et al, 2018(Allen et al, , 2019 and together with changes in liking ratings (∆Liking) across training conditions they can be seen in Figure 2A. As predicted in H1a, the change in liking ratings, from pre-to post-training was negative for no-go foods (∆Liking NOGO ; M = −18.9, SD = 21.9) and greater compared to the change for go foods (∆Liking GO ; M = −11.3, SD = 18.3).…”
Section: Findings From Preregistered Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%