1972
DOI: 10.1029/wr008i004p01077
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rain gage catch variation due to airflow disturbances around a standard rain gage

Abstract: Although the spatial position has an important influence on the performance of a rain gage, the physical presence of the gage itself must be considered a hindrance to its operation. An obstruction to airflow in the vicinity of the gage, owing to the presence of the gage, results in disturbances in the local precipitation pattern in which the rainfall measurement is made. The airflow pattern data obtained in a study of a wind tunnel model and aerodynamic drag characteristics of water drops are used to perform a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Raindrops fall at an angle in windy conditions, so the effective orifice size of the rain gauge changes [ Rinehart , 1983; Hosking et al , 1985]. In addition to rainfall size distribution and gauge design, rainfall catch error depends on the ambient wind speed [e.g., Mueller and Kidder , 1972; Neff , 1977; Folland , 1988; Hanna , 1995; Nespor and Sevruk , 1999; Chang and Harrison , 2005] and is the single largest source of error in precipitation measurements [ Legates , 1987, 1992]. This problem of wind‐based undercatchment is especially apparent with tropical cyclones [ Miller , 1958a].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Raindrops fall at an angle in windy conditions, so the effective orifice size of the rain gauge changes [ Rinehart , 1983; Hosking et al , 1985]. In addition to rainfall size distribution and gauge design, rainfall catch error depends on the ambient wind speed [e.g., Mueller and Kidder , 1972; Neff , 1977; Folland , 1988; Hanna , 1995; Nespor and Sevruk , 1999; Chang and Harrison , 2005] and is the single largest source of error in precipitation measurements [ Legates , 1987, 1992]. This problem of wind‐based undercatchment is especially apparent with tropical cyclones [ Miller , 1958a].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Raindrops fall at an angle in windy conditions, so the effective orifice size of the rain gauge changes [Rinehart, 1983;Hosking et al, 1985]. In addition to rainfall size distribution and gauge design, rainfall catch error depends on the ambient wind speed [e.g., Mueller and Kidder, 1972;Neff, 1977;Folland, 1988;Hanna, 1995; Figure 1. Network of 85 surface weather observation stations.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The tipping-bucket rainfall accumulations are based on the manufacturer-provided calibration. No attempts have been made to correct for wind effects [e.g., see Mueller and Kidder, 1972;Neff, 1977;Folland, 1988;Hanna, 1995;Ne•por and Sevruk, 1999]. Data from the weighing rain gauges for the years 1996 and 1997 are not available yet and thus could not be incorporated into this study, because the process of quality control and converting the chart-recorded changes of rainfall intensity on pluviograph traces into breakpoint data has not been completed.…”
Section: Goodwin Creek Research Watershedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the exception of insplash, all precipitation measurement errors are likely to arise from underestimation of the true value (Mueller and Kidder 1972). The larger catch received by the large gauge on most days may therefore indicate better design or exposure of this instrument.…”
Section: Data Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%