2009
DOI: 10.1007/s00291-009-0189-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Railway track allocation: models and methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
123
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 239 publications
(125 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
123
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Lusby et al (2011) present a recent survey on literature in the field of train timetabling, train dispatching, train platforming, and train routing problems. Caprara et al (2002) focus on the timetable problem for a single, one-way track linking two major stations, with a number of intermediate stations in between.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lusby et al (2011) present a recent survey on literature in the field of train timetabling, train dispatching, train platforming, and train routing problems. Caprara et al (2002) focus on the timetable problem for a single, one-way track linking two major stations, with a number of intermediate stations in between.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They introduced three basic methodologies for allocating capacity on the rail network such as administered, cost-based, and market/value-base. Lusby et al (2011) provided a broad overview of the different techniques for routing trains in railway networks in order to maximise capacity utilisation. In summary, solving these types of problems, result in large formulations.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is thus a need for advanced decision support tools to reduce the dispatchers' workload and to satisfy the requirements of infrastructure managers, train operators and passengers [2]. Recently, advanced models and algorithms have been developed to reschedule trains in complicated railway areas with dense traffic and multiple delayed trains (see, e.g., the literature reviews in [5,14,18]). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%