2023
DOI: 10.1109/tgrs.2023.3319950
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

RailSeg: Learning Local–Global Feature Aggregation With Contextual Information for Railway Point Cloud Semantic Segmentation

Tengping Jiang,
Bisheng Yang,
Yongjun Wang
et al.
Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 112 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to the limited railway data, the trained network is prone to overfitting, making it difficult to ensure the algorithm's robustness in other scenes. Jiang et al [28] proposed a framework named RailSeg, which contains integrated local-global feature extraction, spatial context aggregation, and semantic regularization. This method is computationally intensive and is difficult to be applied in real time.…”
Section: Lidar-based Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Due to the limited railway data, the trained network is prone to overfitting, making it difficult to ensure the algorithm's robustness in other scenes. Jiang et al [28] proposed a framework named RailSeg, which contains integrated local-global feature extraction, spatial context aggregation, and semantic regularization. This method is computationally intensive and is difficult to be applied in real time.…”
Section: Lidar-based Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So far, there is limited research on the real-time segmentation of distant railway tracks using single-frame LiDAR data [14]. While some studies [25,[28][29][30] claim high precision and recall in railway track point cloud segmentation, most of them are conducted on non-real-time processing using data collected from Mobile Laser Scanning (MLS). Moreover, these methods rely on the elevation of the point cloud for segmentation, which may fluctuate significantly due to the installation angle of the LiDAR sensor, terrain variations, and train vibrations, resulting in misclassification of track beds and rail tracks.…”
Section: Lidar-based Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%