Rail Access Pricing for Suburban Services in Europe

Abstract

Until recently, Europe was dominated by state-owned, vertically integrated railroads. Lately, European Union (EU) policies and relevant legislation have introduced the legal separation between railroad operations and infrastructure management. Thus, the railroad infrastructure management companies have started applying charges (termed access pricing) to railroad companies for using infrastructure. Although European policies and legislation set the basic access pricing principles, they did not provide specific rules or methods for deriving infrastructure charging systems. An access pricing system for suburban (commuter) rail services was developed. An overview of practices in EU member states and the United States is presented. The basic principles and economic characteristics of infrastructure charging are outlined. The proposed structure of the infrastructure charging system is discussed, with a distinction between the basic charge-which includes costs for train planning and line operations, infrastructure damage and wear and tear costs, and quality of services-and additional components. Each component is mathematically expressed. The proposed charging system does not include costs related to train operations. To test the robustness of the proposed system, it is applied to the suburban rail services provided by the Greek company AMEL, with trains running on the Greek railroads' infrastructure. The proposed infrastructure charging system can be applied to any railroad by changing the variable values.

Commuter Rail Electrifications That Never Were and What They Teach Us

“…But MNR operated only 14 daily round trips in 2016, which did not suggest a need for electrification. Not surprisingly, an earlier study suggested dual-mode electric/diesel locomotives were more cost-effective than electrification ( 23 ). Furthermore, in 1984 MNR extended electrification on its Harlem Line, which draws some riders from the Danbury Branch’s catchment zone.…”